So do I do it? deprecating the old one?
Stef
On 23 nov. 07, at 15:26, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Oops, I forgot to read my mails newest first.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 8:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So in that case we should rename to two to mooseName. Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/ renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
AA
On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
absoluteFamixName
could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated absoluteFamixName This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the same way
Stef On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class? I tried mooseUniqueName
Point mooseUniqueName
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev