On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
For what it is worth: While I was in Chile last year Alexandre, Johan and I designed and (I think) partly implemented an alternative Mondrian API. The idea was to avoid these multi-argument selectors (like in the Seaside API) and have it much more composable and uniform. Not sure what happened with that?
I would love to see it.
Lukas
On 19 June 2011 14:37, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
On 19 Jun 2011, at 14:33, jannik.laval wrote:
On Jun 19, 2011, at 14:21 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for the explanation.
My pleasure :). But now, let's see if we can make it better. There are two actions that seem to come out of the discussion:
- do a pass over the comments to better reveal that the input collections are always entities (both behind nodes and behind edges)
- reorganize the protocols of ViewRenderer to reveal better the structure of the API
The other thing would be the debugging capabilities.
Who would want to work on these? :)
I will do :) I will begin to work on Moose, on tuesday. I want also to work on DSM.
Great!
Keep us posted. I will open another thread about DSM.
Doru
Jannik
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"We are all great at making mistakes."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev