[Moose-dev] Re: Glamour

Actually the Glamour API could be considered to be an internal DSL to describe browsers. I assume that a forth and five iteration are necessary to make it more user friendly. That is the reason why I did not pursue Glamour this May. I thought instead of going for Glamour I can just go through the effort of learning the ToolBuilder builder DSL -- which in the end is not more difficult either. A note aside: Maybe I push the idea of DSL too much here. The question is: where do we talk about an API and where does the DSL idea start? However --- though there are alot examples -- even more example will help and I recently enjoyed trying out some of them in the Moose-Glamour-Image. --Hannes On 11/4/10, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: