Hi,
MondrianPaintings holds Mondrian views which are typically 2-3 methods each. Distribution Map, with all the Wizard and other computations is more than that, so I think it deserves a package on its own :)
Actually, I do not like categories :). I prefer to have packages for everything.
Cheers, Doru
On 4 May 2010, at 16:38, Simon Denier wrote:
On 4 mai 2010, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Cyrille,
I have a bit of feedback for Distribution Map:
- The computation from Distribution Map Wizard is too expensive
because you iterate over the meta elements and for each of them you go over all elements of Moose through the method includesElementsOfType:
It would be better if you would go over all cached groups and decide based on that rather than traversing the entire entities collection (which can be millions of objects).
- It would be better if Distribution Map gets its own package
because it starts to be large
What does large mean in this context? I mean, I don't understand the benefit of creating a single package for DistributionMap while all others are under MondrianPaintings (within their own categories)
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."