2 Jun
2012
2 Jun
'12
12:18 a.m.
Hi,
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Yes, I can move the default roassal easel accessible
from the Tools menu. I've just committed.
Great, thanks.
Another point.
What is the language supported by the glamour roassal easel? Currently, it uses the low
API. A valid script is:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| b |
b := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: view.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b applyLayout.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Indeed, this is the current case.
shouldn't view be bound to an instance of
ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView?
I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the
ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels.
Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same
Easel?
Cheers,
Doru
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
Hi,
Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However,
this is a rather primitive Easel.
In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all
these editors in the Moose menu.
In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World
menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools
(like PetitParser does).
Alex, what do you say?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev