14 Jan
2014
14 Jan
'14
11:46 p.m.
Very cool, Thomas! I'm looking forward to reading your article.
Cheers
Ricky
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
wrote:
Wow! This is great.
About the license: if you do not put any license, it means nobody can
officially do anything with it.
If you do not want to open the sources, but want to offer a simple "as-is"
license for the binary, perhaps you can use a historical easy to grasp
notice like in: http://opensource.org/licenses/HPND
Or you could simply use a CreativeCommons-Attribution:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
And thanks for promoting Moose, too! When the article appears, please do
let us know so that we can advertise it more.
Cheers,
Doru
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Thomas Haug <thomas.haug(a)mathema.de> wrote:
Hi everybody,
yesterday I have placed a new version of the FamixGenerator on my (german)
webpage: it does now create Famix 2.1 and 3.0 models from multiple .NET
assemblies, but I have still a few miles to go...
So if you want to give it a try:
http://www.sharpmetrics.net/index.php/famix-generator
I have not yet written an explicit license file... so the FamixGenerator
can be used "as is" for all sorts of projects (non-commercial and
commercial).
In a couple of days a new article based on this tool, CodeCity and the
underlying Moose version will be published in the german dotnetpro
magazine. Hope this helps as kind of advertisement for Moose, CodeCity and
Sourcecity (and my personal interpretation SharpCity, which I have not yet
released so far ;-) ).
Take care,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"