Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6621 discussions

Moose-All.441
by Alexandre Bergel 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

When I tried to load it, I have a lot of question whether I want to load older dependencies. Jannik, did you do an update before saving ? Just asking... Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

3 2

[Fix] Issue 74: Drag and drop in a Mondrian window set as a background
by Alexandre Bergel 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Please test. I left the bug open in the google code site. Be the first to close it if the bug is solved for you. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

2 1

moose-cook
by Tudor Girba 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Hi Jannik, I took a quick look at Moose-Cook. It looks nice, but I think it would fit better in Famix-Extensions. What do you think? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "It's not how it is, it is how we see it."

2 1

all moose and glamour tests are green
by Tudor Girba 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Hi, I am happy to announce that all Moose and Glamour related tests are green (820 in total). Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "No matter how many recipes we'll know, we'll still value a chef."

3 2

Morphic.mse
by Laval Jannik 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Hi all, A mse file of Morphic categories (categories are considered as FamixPackages) is available in http://www.jannik-laval.eu/assets/files/softAnalysis/mseFiles/ Cheers --- Jannik Laval PhD Student - Rmod Team - INRIA Certified Project Management Associate (IPMA) http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://rmod.lille.inria.fr ---

2 4

FAMIXClass>>outgoingAccesses
by Alexandre Bergel 01 Aug '09

01 Aug '09

Dear List, I produced a mse 3.0 file for Swing. Loading it in PhaMoose produces an error. #outgoingAccesses is sent to a famix class. Does it not make sense to ask a class for it outgoing accesses ? Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

4 10

moose finder
by Tudor Girba 01 Aug '09

01 Aug '09

Hi, I am happy to announce that with the great help of Jorge, we now have a first working version of a Moose Finder based on Glamour. Some of the features: - you get a menu for each item you select in the group view or in the entity view. This menu is rendered based on the menuItem:category: or menuItem: pragmas. - in the group view you can search for your entities using Smalltalk. For example, "each numberOfMethods > 1" applied on classes will get you the classes that have more than 1 method. There is a known issue consisting in the selection not being shown on the current pane. However, you do get the selection on the next pane. - in the Editor pane you get an experimental editor based on Magritte. The editing does not quite work yet, but you get an idea of all properties. - in the Evaluator pane, you get the option of writing a script whose result can be spawned on the next pane. For example, if opened on the group of classes, "self flatCollect: #methods" will return all the methods of these classes. To get it in the next pane you have to select it and press Apple+o. There is a known issue in that every time you change something, you have to press Apple+s to tell Morphic that something changed. - For a FAMIXClassGroup, you also get a Complexity tab - For a FAMIXClass you also get a Blueprint tab To give it a try, just call "openInMoose" on your favorite model, or Moose object. Feedback is more than welcome :). Of course, you should get the latest versions of Moose-Finder and Glamour, but probably best would be to update the complete Moose with: ScriptLoader loadLatestPackage: 'MooseLoader' from: 'http://www.squeaksource.com '. (Smalltalk at: #MooseLoader) load Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."

2 1

loading configurations
by Tudor Girba 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Hi, Over the past couple of days I worked on some more detailed dependencies between Moose packages in Pharo. The generic code for expressing and loading dependencies is based on the work of Lukas and Jorge (Gofer and Flair from http://source.lukas-renggli.ch). In the process we created a small DSL for expressing dependencies. To get an idea, you can load the Moose distribution via: MooseLoader load. There is only one small problem in that Famix-Smalltalk just does not want to load for some reason still to be identified. Other than that, you can now inspect the graph of dependencies via: MooseLoader all. I attached here a Mondrian visualization of the dependencies. With red, I marked the packages that have newer versions in Monticello. If you load MondrianPaintings, you can also get the visualization via: MOSmalltalkPaintings new viewFlairLoadable: MooseLoader all Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Being happy is a matter of choice."

2 1

loadRio is not correct
by stephane ducasse 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

loadRIO "self loadRIO" | instClass | instClass := self environment at: #Installer ifAbsent: [self new installingInstaller]. (Smalltalk at: #Rio ifAbsent: [ instClass ss project: 'Rio'; install: 'Rio-Kernel'; install: 'Rio-Grande'. ]). self new installingInstaller looks suspicious to me. Stef

2 1

Re: [Pharo-project] [OT] Mondrian question
by Tudor Girba 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Hi Mariano, Mondrian is an engine for scripting visualizations of arbitrary models. You start from a set of objects and you specify how you want to display them. Instead of going for hardcoded scripts, I suggest taking a look at the scripting capabilities. Take a look here for an example (although the example is for VW it largely works the same in Pharo): http://moose.unibe.ch/tools/mondrian/tour So, to answer your questions: 1) yes, you just have to connect the proper nodes with the desired edges 2) yes, you can specify exactly what objects you want to be displayed Please let us know if you get more questions. Cheers, Doru p.s. I think best would be to continue the conversation on the moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch mailing list. On 30 Jul 2009, at 15:43, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > First of all, let me know if there is a better place to ask > questions related to Mondrian. > > I am preparing my ESUG presentation and I am a bit lazy to some UML > diagrams. I would like to do a reverse engineer of my code. The main > problem is that most (if not all) UML software are with "java style" > using () in methods and you cannot import smalltalk code. So, I want > to give Mondrian a try. > > I loaded it into Pharo and draw the classes I need, using something > like this: > > MOReadme new umlFor: self myClassesToDraw > > The thing is that only "inherits" relationship is drawn. Now I wonder: > > 1) can I draw by hand associations and dependencies between classes ? > > 2) Is there a way to show only some methods instead of ALL of them ? > > Thanks, > > Mariano > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- www.tudorgirba.com "It's not how it is, it is how we see it."

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev