July 2012 - Moose-dev

Issue 781 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark getters setters and constants

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 781 by santiago...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark getters setters and constants http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=781 The property "kind" of the MSE models should be used to mark if a method is a getter, a setters or constant. Currently is only used to mark if a method is constructor

10 years, 11 months

1
2
0 / 0

Issue 811 in moose-technology: Create more virtual association in MooseChef

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Milestone-4.7 New issue 811 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Create more virtual association in MooseChef http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=811 Famix recognizes 4 types of associations (reference, access, inheritance, invocation) and Moosechef was built upon these dependencies (queryAllOutgoingReferences, ...) But this will miss a good deal of actual dependencies, because many of them are not expressed by associations: - exceptions caught, thrown - parameter types in parameterized classes - use of annotations - other?

10 years, 12 months

1
3
0 / 0

Issue 734 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export parameters for stub methods

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 734 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export parameters for stub methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=734 If we analyze this code, the print method will appear without parameters. public class NoParametersInStubMethods { public void invoking() { System.out.print("aString"); } }

11 years

2
2
0 / 0

Issue 761 in moose-technology: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 761 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=761 see discussion on mailing list: "invokingMethods broken in moose or inFamix" source code: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/enhancer/engines/... The method getLinkedEntityTypes in org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.keywordextraction.linking.EntityLinker has an empty collection of invokingMethods even though the method is invoked for example by "process()".

11 years

3
4
0 / 0

To a unified software model repository for Moose.

by jannik.laval

Hi guys, Each time we need to do case studies in Moose, we have to select the software application, in a certain version and probably without all the source code needed. This results on evaluations that are probably not reproducible. I think that we need to unify our efforts and share the mse files of our models. With that, it will be not necessary to generate a FAMIX model each time we need one. For now, I begun to generate the model from the Qualitas Corpus 'e' (http://qualitascorpus.com/). There are 486 multiple versions of multiple Java systems. The mse files are really big (more than 650Mo for Eclipse_SDK3.7). I tried to load the biggest one in Moose, and it loads ! I just needed to attribute 2Gb of memory in the info.plist file of Moose 4.6. I propose to put the files on a server. For all the tar.bz2 files, I need 3.65Gb. Now, we lack ok at least two pieces of information : (i) the version of verveineJ used for the extraction. For now, VerveineJ has no version (I took the latest one). (ii) the version(s) of Moose that can load the file. I tried one mse file with Moose4.6. We also need a server that can accept all the files. Any suggestion ? Jannik

11 years

13
57
0 / 0

Issue 762 in moose-technology: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 762 by usman.bh...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=762 First, I invoke VerveineJ from Moose menu to analyse a program A. It analyses the program and imports its entities in a moose model. I invoke VJ once more from moose menu to analyse another program B. When VJ is executed and the entities of program B are imported, I also find in the same model the entities related to the program A. So, VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from Moose interface. I think the problem can be resolved by deleting output.mse once VJ has finished its analysis and the entities are imported in a moose model.

11 years

2
9
0 / 0

Issue 746 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.6 New issue 746 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=746 In some cases, calls to external libraries get reified as methods with proper signatures, but without parameters. I am trying to reproduce this using the following example (in ad_hoc/MultipleSignatures.java): package ad_hoc; import java.io.PrintWriter; import java.io.StringWriter; public class MultipleSignatures { public void callToRegularPrintStackTrace(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace() } public void callToPrintStackTraceWithParam(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(new StringWriter())) } } I encountered a similar code in a case study. However, in this case, I cannot even get the parser to recognize both printStackTrace calls.

11 years

1
4
0 / 0

Issue 769 in moose-technology: Glamour should support drag and drop

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-4.6 Component-Glamour New issue 769 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Glamour should support drag and drop http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=769 Something like this: a list allowItemDrag: [:item :list | ... ]; itemDrag: [:item :list | ... ] a list allowDropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ]; dropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ]

11 years

5
12
0 / 0

Issue 809 in moose-technology: Glamour selection should happen through an action

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Glamour Milestone-4.7 New issue 809 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Glamour selection should happen through an action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=809 Right now, selecting an item in the user interface will directly populate the #selection port. However, this is less than ideal because it does not allow the developer to intervene in this process. One possibility would be to introduce a selectionAction that is triggered by the ui, and to provide the default behavior is simply setting the #selection port.

11 years

1
1
0 / 0

Issue 708 in moose-technology: Fame should accept comments both for properties and for meta descriptions

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-MooseCore Milestone-4.6 New issue 708 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Fame should accept comments both for properties and for meta descriptions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=708 Currently, the MSEComment: is used to define comments of a property. SomeEntity>>someProperty <MSEProperty: ...> <MSEComment: 'comment'> This is used by the MetaBrowser but not by Fame. At the very least, we should add a means to add MSEComment: to the class side for the overall class.

11 years

1
5
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev July 2012