Moose-dev July 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

22 participants
110 discussions

update for Roassal
by Usman Bhatti 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Hello, I am trying to add an update event in GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer so that when the pane containing the roassal visualization is sent an update event, the corresponding roassal visualization is redrawn (please see: http://code.google.com/p/**moose-technology/issues/**detail?id=808<http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=808> ). Now, I can trigger painting block of the GLMRoassalPresentation but there are some missing entities and the layout not being applied properly.Please find attached to this mail my code for GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer class to trigger the update event. Can you please see what is missing in my code that does not allow proper rendering of roassal visualization? You can use this code to test the updated rendering feature: | browser startNumber | browser := GLMTabulator withStatusbar. startNumber := 1. browser column: #one. browser transmit to: #one; andShow: [ :a | a roassal title: 'Numbers in Roassal'; painting: [:view :number | view shape label. view interaction on: ROMouseClick do: [ :event | ROFocusView new on: event element view: view raw ]. view nodes: (startNumber to: number). view edgesFrom: [:each | each // 5 ]. self halt. view treeLayout. view addMenu: 'Refresh' callBack: [ :stack | startNumber := 10. (browser paneNamed: #one) update ]. ]]. browser openOn: 42 tx, Usman

3 2

Re: To a unified software model repository for Moose.
by Stéphane Ducasse 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

On Jul 25, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Andrea Caracciolo wrote: > Hi Stef, > > I read your replies in the mailing list and i wanted to clarify some doubts. > As I understand, your points are the following: > - extend the FAMIX meta-model adding new meta-data to make the concept of "project version" and "project" explicit. not necessarily. First the moose infrastructure. > - supporting the exchange of partial models Yes. > To me it seems that both of the mentioned ideas contradict the purpose of the MSE format. > MSE is good for packaging structural information about one single project snapshot. > If you want to represent a project and all of its versions as a whole, you need to come up with a new representation format. no :) mse is a format to exchange data. > Also shrinking models looks quite hard. You end up with a lot of broken dependencies and you need to generate a file which fits your personal analysis requirements. Not really. Have a look at MooseImportingContext it is there to manage that you always save and load a coherent model. In fact I use it to import coherent Smalltalk models. So loading is the same. You look at the graph dependencies and pay attention that if you remove attributes you do not use something that requires it. This is the job of the ImportingContext to manage that for you. We should ask cyrille because I think that I remember that he worked on partial loading. Now at the end some graph dependencies where expressed in FAME and I lost track. > In my opinion, the best option would be to transition to relational database as an intermediate representation medium. Give a try and let us know but I have some doubts. > Instead of exchanging models through mse files, you replicate a certain set of DB entires. Saving to relational databases graphs is not easy and simple. For the moment imagine that we want to build a dashboard where we monitor some metrics. you can write a script that checkout source code launch verveineJ generate a new version in use then you load the use file (filtering information if you can = make sense) compute your metrics save a strip down version of your model that fit the purpose of your analysis now since you want to do a trend analysis you load following the strategies developed by andre all the stripped versions, or just 10 of them and the latest…. and you compute your dashboard data. To me a project: an entity managing files and sources, versions on a disk or whatever it is stored . After a project could have different loading strategies but well encapsulated. > Parsing of MSE is replaced by recursively exploring the newly created database entries. > This would also allow to have different strategies for loading famix objects in memory. > > > Cheers > _____________________________ > Andrea Caracciolo -- caracciolo(a)iam.unibe.ch > Software Composition Group > University of Bern > > > > > >

1 0

Issue 813 in moose-technology: Java primitive type "int" created as FamixType
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Status: New Owner: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 813 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Java primitive type "int" created as FamixType http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=813 Parsing some files in Eclipse creates a FamixType for the primitive type int

1 0

Progress Indicator
by Dennis Schenk 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Hi all, Could anyone point me in the right direction on how to create a progress indicator for long running tasks? Are there any examples, implementation I could look at? I found *MooseCustomTask* and *SystemProgressBarMorph*. I'm not sure about using the MooseCustomTask, because what I want to do is not directly related to moose. Its just a generic task. Are there any other classes that handle the display of progress bars? Thanks, Dennis

2 2

FAMIX: Lines of code for nested namespaces
by Dennis Schenk 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Hi all, Whats the best way to get LOC for nested FAMIXNamespaces? Lets say I'm looking at a FAMIX model of argouml. I used the "Infer Namespace Parents Based on Names" command in the Moose Panel. I have a namespace argouml (org.argouml), and a namespace profile (org.argouml.profile). Calling numberOfLinesOfCode on the second namespace gives me a correct number of around 1000 (I assume because the "children" of profile are actually FAMIXClasses). Calling it on the first one returns 0. So what would be the best way to get LOC on parent namespaces like "org", or "org.argouml"? Also is this by design that LOC does not get propagated up in the hierarchy or is it even a bug? Cheers, Dennis

3 4

Issue 812 in moose-technology: All FamixType are at classScope in MooseChef
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 812 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: All FamixType are at classScope in MooseChef http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=812 All FamixType are at classScope in MooseChef This means for example that the Java primitive type "void" can be returned by a mooseChef query: xyz queryOutgoingDependencies atClassScope there is an outgoing dependency to void, but void should not be at class scope need to change FAMIXType>>atClassScope and FAMIXClass>>atClassScope

1 0

Issue 810 in moose-technology: Create virtual association TypeDeclaration in MooseChef
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Status: New Owner: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Milestone-4.7 New issue 810 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Create virtual association TypeDeclaration in MooseChef http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=810 Famix recognizes 4 types of associations (reference, access, inheritance, invocation) and Moosechef was built upon these dependencies (queryAllOutgoingReferences, ...) but this misses some actual dependencies that are not expressed by FamixAssociations like: return type of a method or type of a variable Since we now have a nice general API to query dependencies, it would be nicer if it were complete, ... A possible solution would be to invent some new "virtual associations" (TypeDeclaration) and create queries for this, ...

1 0

MooseChef: TypeDeclaration virtual association
by Nicolas Anquetil 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

With The aid of Andre, we finished creating the TypeDeclaration virtual association in MooseChef (see also http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/Several-modifications-to-MooseChef-tp3…). We also created a queryIncoming/OutgoingDependencies that will gather all dependencies from a model: allAssociations (real association from Famix) + TypeDeclarations (virtual association that is "hidden" like the type of a variable). The MooseChef documentation should be updated accordingly (see "<added>" markers for additional stuff): --- ** Primitive queries return associations Primitive queries return a set of dependencies related to the receiver. Such dependencies are represented by instances of FAMIXAssociation: invocations, accesses, inheritances, and references. <added> MooseChef also recognizes an association that does not exists as such in Famix: TypeDeclaration. It exists only for statically typed languages and relates a variable (FAMIXStructuralEntity) to its type, or a method to its return type. <added/> receiver queryAllIncomingInvocations querySureIncomingInvocations queryIncomingAccesses queryIncomingReferences queryIncomingInheritances <added> queryIncomingTypeDeclarations <added/> receiver queryAllOutgoingInvocations querySureOutgoingInvocations queryOutgoingAccesses queryOutgoingReferences queryOutgoingInheritances <added> queryOutgoingTypeDeclarations <added/> [...] Some composite queries are also defined on top static associations = accesses + references + inheritances sure associations = static + sure invocations all associations = static + invocations <added> dependencies = all associations + typeDeclaration <added/> --- There are still some additional hidden dependencies in Famix as discussed in http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/MooseChef-hidden-dependencies-tp354895… tests are green (in my image) nicolas

2 3

java, c/c++ solutions and licenses
by Tudor Girba 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Hi, Just to clarify the situation. We have two parsers that are mature enough for large cases studies. They are both closed source: - VerveineJ: is closed source and it is likely to gain a license that will allow "friends" to use it for free, or something in this direction. At the moment, the sources and the build are available for anyone (although the license is not yet specified). It is mainly built by Nicolas Anquetil (and I helped a bit). - inFamix: is free to use in any context, but you have to agree with their license usage (so, no real automated download). It is a subset from the inFusion commercial platform. It also supports C/C++. It is built by www.intooitus.com and I helped them a bit, too. For what they cover, neither is quite complete in the little details, but they are almost there. VerveineJ is slightly better in the coverage of Annotations and a couple of more details (like References). They both export about the same metrics. I would be interested in working with someone to build a little comparison infrastructure: we take some source code, and we generate a simple diff report on the build server. It would be important for this community to get a robust solution for Java. I worked quite long on getting both of these mature enough and in evolving FAMIX to support the new language constructs in Java (e.g., Generics and Annotations), and I would still be interested in continuing this enhancement. inFamix also offers C/C++ support, and there one of the major headaches was given by the type alias possibilities, but that is solved now both in FAMIX and in the parser. >From my experience, the most tedious work in this area is to go through each case study and deal with all the little details not just at the parser level, but also at the meta-model level. We are getting close to a solid solution for Java, but we need to push for the extra mile. Talking about the meta-model we need to rethink completely the navigation API and be based solely on MooseChef (and possibly Lift). I would be interested in getting people to work with me on this, as well. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."

1 0

Issue 808 in moose-technology: refresh a GLMRoassalPresentation
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

Status: New Owner: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal New issue 808 by guillaum...(a)gmail.com: refresh a GLMRoassalPresentation http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=808 the update function on GLMRoassalPresentation don't call the painting block. Consequently the visualization is not refreshed.

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev July 2012