Moose-dev June 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

32 participants
176 discussions

Issue 640 in moose-technology: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-EyeSee New issue 640 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=640 Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram in not working. See example below: | diag factory | factory := ESDummyFactory new. factory yValues: #(22 25 13 16 24 28 35 24 32 24 46 12). factory identifiers: #('January' 'February' 'March' 'April' 'Mai' 'June' 'July' 'August' 'September' 'October' 'November' 'December'). diag := ESDiagramRenderer new. (diag lineDiagram) y: #yValue; width: 500; height: 400; lineWidth: 5; defaultFontSize: 12; identifier: #identifier; labels: [:each | each]; defaultColor: Color blue; yAxisLabel: 'Clients'; regularAxis; deviationValue: 22; deviationDescription: 'avg 2006'; models: factory buildDummies. "startLineAtZero;" ^ diag open

11 years, 9 months

Issue 637 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 637 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637 A call to the default constructor should be modeled like: - create a stub constructor in the target class - create an invocation to the constructor See the attached class for a sample. Attachments: DefaultConstructor.java 184 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 636 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 636 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=636 Static fields or methods should be marked with hasClassScope=true: public static int attributeWithClassScope; public static void methodWithClassScope() {} See the attached sample class. Attachments: ClassScope.java 179 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 650 in moose-technology: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Mondrian Milestone-4.5 New issue 650 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=650 The multiple selection mechanism is confusing because you have to release the mouse to start selecting. It should be disabled until it works properly.

12 years, 2 months

Re: Issue 396 in moose-technology: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Cc: tudor.girba Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396 I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few things. view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ] What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has clicked? It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo: What do you think? Cheers, Alexandre

12 years, 2 months

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Lazy edges in Mondrian

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 113 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Lazy edges in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 Should we postpone this one until later?

12 years, 2 months

Issue 501 in moose-technology: Cache independence

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 501 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cache independence http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=501 The core of Mondrian is not independent of the cache implementation. The logic of Mondrian rely on the cache to implement its semantics. This is obviously wrong. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= bounds "Answer the bounds of the receiver." "the bounds is has an absolute origin" "Note that the bounds computed above, may have (and it is likely to) a different origin. The reason is that the layout is in charge to position the nodes properly" | basicBounds | boundsCache ifNotNil: [ ^ boundsCache ]. "We check if the shape if present" self shapeBoundsAt: self shape ifPresent: [ :b | ^ boundsCache := b ]. basicBounds := self shape computeBoundsFor: self. self shapeBoundsAt: self shape put: basicBounds. ^ boundsCache := basicBounds -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= translateAbsoluteCacheBy: aPoint absoluteBoundsCache ifNil: [ ^ self ]. absoluteBoundsCache := absoluteBoundsCache translateBy: aPoint -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thanks to Santiago Vidal for pointing this out!

12 years, 6 months

Issue 503 in moose-technology: Abstract classes and Hapao

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: vhane...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Spy New issue 503 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Abstract classes and Hapao http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=503 Gaëtan le Brun suggested to remove abstract classes before running the test in Hapao. This makes sense

12 years, 6 months

Issue 601 in moose-technology: Covered methods and tests

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Hapao New issue 601 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Covered methods and tests http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=601 It would be good to see what are the tests that _indirectly_ tests a methods. Thanks Laurent & Patrick

12 years, 6 months

Issue 509 in moose-technology: Modularization Quality Metric

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 509 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Modularization Quality Metric http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=509 We implemented the Bunch metrics of coupling and cohesion as quality metrics for existing packages (FAMIXPackage) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespace). Now the idea is to implement the Modularization Quality Metric as a quality metric for existing group of packages (FAMIXPackageGroup) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespaceGroup). Pointer to the papers that propose the metrics: Using Automatic Clustering to Produce High-Level System Organizations of Source Code (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=693283) Bunch: A Clustering Tool for the Recovery and Maintenance of Software System Structures (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=792498)

12 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev June 2011