Comment #1 on issue 432 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Popup should appear only
when a certain modifier key is pressed
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=432
Another option would be to have the rendering happening in another thread.
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 637 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation
to the default constructor
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637
A call to the default constructor should be modeled like:
- create a stub constructor in the target class
- create an invocation to the constructor
See the attached class for a sample.
Attachments:
DefaultConstructor.java 184 bytes
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 636 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=636
Static fields or methods should be marked with hasClassScope=true:
public static int attributeWithClassScope;
public static void methodWithClassScope() {}
See the attached sample class.
Attachments:
ClassScope.java 179 bytes
Updates:
Cc: tudor.girba
Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh
start and end nodes in the edge action
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396
I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few
things.
view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ]
What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has
clicked?
It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing
code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo:
What do you think?
Cheers,
Alexandre
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 501 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cache independence
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=501
The core of Mondrian is not independent of the cache implementation. The
logic of Mondrian rely on the cache to implement its semantics. This is
obviously wrong.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
bounds
"Answer the bounds of the receiver."
"the bounds is has an absolute origin"
"Note that the bounds computed above, may have (and it is likely to) a
different origin. The reason is that the layout is in charge to position
the nodes properly"
| basicBounds |
boundsCache ifNotNil: [ ^ boundsCache ].
"We check if the shape if present"
self shapeBoundsAt: self shape ifPresent: [ :b | ^ boundsCache := b ].
basicBounds := self shape computeBoundsFor: self.
self shapeBoundsAt: self shape put: basicBounds.
^ boundsCache := basicBounds
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
translateAbsoluteCacheBy: aPoint
absoluteBoundsCache ifNil: [ ^ self ].
absoluteBoundsCache := absoluteBoundsCache translateBy: aPoint
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Thanks to Santiago Vidal for pointing this out!