Moose-dev May 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

33 participants
186 discussions

Mondrian refactorization
by Santiago Vidal 19 May '11

19 May '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> Date: 2011/5/18 Subject: Re: Mondrian To: Santiago Vidal <santiago.a.vidal(a)gmail.com> Cc: Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>, Claudia Marcos < marcos.claudia(a)gmail.com> Hi, Please let's move this discussion to the moose-dev mailing list. It would be a good documentation of Mondrian. You can register here: https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev and send the mail here: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch Cheers, Doru On 18 May 2011, at 14:55, Santiago Vidal wrote: > Hi, > I indented the methods and removed the 'MO' class prefix from each visit method. > I'm not sure about the best way to avoid the creation of a new visitor each time a shape is displayed. Should I save a visitor for each MOGraphElement? The canvas changes each time that a shape is displayed? Can you please tell me what is the cache that I have to moved to the visitor? > > On another topic with Claudia we are advising the final work of two student in which we are going to use Moose. Specifically, we will use Moose to compare different versions of an open source system with the goal of identify differences in its modules. I would like to use Moose in my phd thesis too, so this a first approach. > > Cheers > Santiago > > > 2011/5/17 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> > Thanks. It works now: > http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/mondrian-latest-dev-on-pharo-1.2/213/ > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 17 May 2011, at 22:32, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > > Can you please lunch the build ? > > > > Cheers, > > Alexandre > > > > > > On 17 May 2011, at 16:03, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > >> Hi again, > >> > >> The build based on the 'default' configuration still says that something is missing: > >> http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/mondrian-latest-dev-on-pharo-1.2/ > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Doru > >> > >> > >> On 17 May 2011, at 21:43, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> On 17 May 2011, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Santiago, > >>>> > >>>> I updated the configuration. Your new package is now in. > >>>> The Jenkins should stop complaining by now :-) > >>> > >>> I started a build of Mondrian to check. > >>> > >>>> Each time a node is displayed, a new visitor is created. I do not think this is necessary. > >>> > >>> This is actually not wanted at all because the renderer might have some state later one. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Doru > >>> > >>>> Would you mind to indent the code with a tabulation at each line? For example: > >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>>> acceptVisitor: aVisitor > >>>> ^aVisitor visitMODashedLineShape: self. > >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>>> > >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>>> acceptVisitor: aVisitor > >>>> ^ aVisitor visitMODashedLineShape: self. > >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>>> > >>>> Can you remove the 'MO' class prefix from each visit method? (e.g., visitMODashedLineShape: -> visitDashedLineShape:) > >>>> I will do some benchmark to see if we are slower, but we should not be actually. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Alexandre > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- Ing. Santiago A. Vidal ISISTAN Research Institute UNICEN University Paraje Arroyo Seco Campus Universitario (B7001BBO) Tandil, Bs. As. - Argentina Phone: 54 2293 439840 Ext. 42 Fax: 54 2293 439681 Email: svidal(a)exa.unicen.edu.ar http://www.exa.unicen.edu.ar/~svidal

3 3

Issue 629 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should not export implicit variables without parentBehaviouralEntity
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 18 May '11

18 May '11

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 629 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should not export implicit variables without parentBehaviouralEntity http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=629 Some implicit variables are exported without a parentBehaviouralEntity. To reproduce it: - download ArgoUML 0.28.1: http://argouml-downloads.tigris.org/argouml-0.28.1/ - there are several instances (about 5-6 out of 2000+) of implicit variables without parrentBehaviouralEntity

3 4

moose and humane assessment on a5 paper
by Tudor Girba 18 May '11

18 May '11

Hi, Perhaps this can be of interest for you: http://www.tudorgirba.com/blog/humane-assessment-moose-a5 Comments are welcome :) Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "What we can governs what we wish."

1 0

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: moose-latest-dev #380
by Tudor Girba 17 May '11

17 May '11

Hi, It looks like Mondrian still has a red test. Cheers, Doru On 17 May 2011, at 23:27, admin(a)moosetechnology.org wrote: > See <http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/380/> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."

1 0

moose wikipedia page
by Tudor Girba 17 May '11

17 May '11

Hi, I added a Wikipedia page for Moose: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moose_(analysis) Feel free to enhance it. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "One cannot do more than one can do."

3 2

SourceLanguage Object
by Usman Bhatti 17 May '11

17 May '11

I am trying to set the sourcelanguage object of the FamixRepository. So, I create my own subclass of the Famix.SourceLanguage, on the lines of java as follows: [FamePackage("FAMIX")] [FameDescription("CSharpSourceLanguage")] class CSharpSourceLanguage : SourceLanguage { //couldn't find anymore info to set for the class in VerveineJ } And I add it to the famixrepository. This how it appears in the mse file: (FAMIX.SourceLanguage (id: 30)) However, moose does only provide information that its a SourceLanguage object, but does know which source language was used. My questions are: 1. What are the parameters of the SourceLanguage that we should set. I do not see any setName() method? 2. What information does Moose require when parsing Famix.SourceLanguage object? thanx in advance, Usman

2 1

[ANN] Moose Suite 4.4
by Tudor Girba 17 May '11

17 May '11

We are happy to announce the Moose Suite version 4.4: http://moosetechnology.org/download What is new: • New EyeSee engine for scripting visual charts • New Kumpel importer for SVN repositories • New Metanool engine for supporting dynamic annotations of models • Simplified look and feel • Improved VerveineJ compatibility for Java parsing • Improved FAMIX support for Java systems • Improved support for complex shapes in Mondrian • Improved RPackage engine support for the Smalltalk importer A list of issues addressed in this release can be found at: http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/list?can=1&q=status=Fixed%… Have fun, The Moose Team http://moosetechnology.org

4 7

rpackage status
by Tudor Girba 17 May '11

17 May '11

Hi, I lost track of what happened with RPackage. Cyrille, Stef, could you summarize the status? I see that the tests are working on 1.2 (except for the expected failing ones). Is it good enough to rely on it for the release? If yes, we release tomorrow. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."

3 12

Issue 617 in moose-technology: RPackage has a self halt
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 17 May '11

17 May '11

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: cy.delau...(a)gmail.com, stephane...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Component-SmalltalkImporter Milestone-4.4 New issue 617 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: RPackage has a self halt http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=617 there is a self halt in CompiledMethod>>packageFromOrganizer: According to the flag, this self halt should not be reached. However, try loading the following code after RPackage is loaded and you will see that the self halt is reached. Gofer new squeaksource: 'bifrost'; package: 'ConfigurationOfBifrost'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfBifrost) perform: #loadDefault. You can try to execute the above code in the latest moose-dev which already has the latest 3.0: http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/…

1 7

Moose slides?
by Simon Denier 16 May '11

16 May '11

Hi all I'm looking for some slides updated with recent Moose releases. At least to see and show what's new. -- Simon Denier

4 7

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev May 2011