Moose-dev March 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

24 participants
119 discussions

Re: Issue 396 in moose-technology: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Updates: Cc: tudor.girba Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396 I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few things. view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ] What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has clicked? It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo: What do you think? Cheers, Alexandre

1 1

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Lazy edges in Mondrian
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 113 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Lazy edges in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 Should we postpone this one until later?

2 5

Issue 501 in moose-technology: Cache independence
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 501 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cache independence http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=501 The core of Mondrian is not independent of the cache implementation. The logic of Mondrian rely on the cache to implement its semantics. This is obviously wrong. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= bounds "Answer the bounds of the receiver." "the bounds is has an absolute origin" "Note that the bounds computed above, may have (and it is likely to) a different origin. The reason is that the layout is in charge to position the nodes properly" | basicBounds | boundsCache ifNotNil: [ ^ boundsCache ]. "We check if the shape if present" self shapeBoundsAt: self shape ifPresent: [ :b | ^ boundsCache := b ]. basicBounds := self shape computeBoundsFor: self. self shapeBoundsAt: self shape put: basicBounds. ^ boundsCache := basicBounds -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= translateAbsoluteCacheBy: aPoint absoluteBoundsCache ifNil: [ ^ self ]. absoluteBoundsCache := absoluteBoundsCache translateBy: aPoint -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thanks to Santiago Vidal for pointing this out!

1 2

Issue 503 in moose-technology: Abstract classes and Hapao
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: vhane...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Spy New issue 503 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Abstract classes and Hapao http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=503 Gaëtan le Brun suggested to remove abstract classes before running the test in Hapao. This makes sense

1 1

Issue 509 in moose-technology: Modularization Quality Metric
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 28 May '12

28 May '12

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 509 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Modularization Quality Metric http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=509 We implemented the Bunch metrics of coupling and cohesion as quality metrics for existing packages (FAMIXPackage) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespace). Now the idea is to implement the Modularization Quality Metric as a quality metric for existing group of packages (FAMIXPackageGroup) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespaceGroup). Pointer to the papers that propose the metrics: Using Automatic Clustering to Produce High-Level System Organizations of Source Code (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=693283) Bunch: A Clustering Tool for the Recovery and Maintenance of Software System Structures (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=792498)

1 2

Issue 489 in moose-technology: Glamour: action list without the dropdown
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: tudor.girba Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 489 by jfabry: Glamour: action list without the dropdown http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=489 I have a Glamour pane that is an actionList where I do 5 populate:on:entitled:with: so that the pane has 5 buttons. Now what happens is that the pane also has a dropdown menu, with the same actions as the buttons. This menu should not be there according to Doru ...

1 2

Re: Issue 191 in moose-technology: Do not execute unnecessary transmissions
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 191 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Do not execute unnecessary transmissions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=191 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 1

Issue 543 in moose-technology: inFusion does not export in UTF-8
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 11 Feb '12

11 Feb '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: georgega...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools New issue 543 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFusion does not export in UTF-8 http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=543 MSE should be in UTF-8.

1 2

Issue 532 in moose-technology: inFusion should also export PrimitiveTypes
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 11 Feb '12

11 Feb '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: georgega...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools New issue 532 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFusion should also export PrimitiveTypes http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=532 void, long, int, boolean, char, char[] ... should be PrimitiveTypes, not Classes

1 3

Re: Issue 440 in moose-technology: FamixInvocation>>to should return candidates instead of receiver
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 11 Feb '12

11 Feb '12

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 440 by simon.de...(a)gmail.com: FamixInvocation>>to should return candidates instead of receiver http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=440 Fixed as first part of MooseChef integration

1 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev March 2011