Moose-dev February 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

23 participants
136 discussions

Issue 514 in moose-technology: Introduce the PharoImageSourceAnchor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-SmalltalkImporter Component-Famix New issue 514 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Introduce the PharoImageSourceAnchor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=514 Currently, FAMIXClass>>sourceText has a hack that checks for mooseModel isSmalltalk explicitly. We should introduce a PharoImageSourceAnchor that properly takes care of this.

10 years, 1 month

Issue 528 in moose-technology: Remove Category Importer

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-4.3 Component-Famix Component-SmalltalkImporter New issue 528 by jannik.l...(a)gmail.com: Remove Category Importer http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=528 With RPackage, Category importer is useless, We should remove it. They are some referecnes in examples in DSM.

10 years, 1 month

Re: Issue 228 in moose-technology: Nested browsers do not take "when", or "display" into account

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #4 on issue 228 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Nested browsers do not take "when", or "display" into account http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=228 (No comment was entered for this change.)

10 years, 5 months

Issue 527 in moose-technology: Add ModelInfo to hold extra information in MSE

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-MooseCore Milestone-4.3 New issue 527 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Add ModelInfo to hold extra information in MSE http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=527 We should add a special MooseModelInfo entity that can be serialized in MSE. Like this we would have a backward compatible solution for storing extra information in MSE such as: - source language - importer version - metamodel version - importing date - source version I will give it a try for 4.3

11 years, 1 month

Issue 516 in moose-technology: System Complexity displays more than the classes in the group

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 516 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: System Complexity displays more than the classes in the group http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=516 Currently, the algorithm to identify the hierarchies does not limit the result to the current class group, but it takes all the subclasses of the superclass. This means that if you have a group with Object inside, you will end up with a system complexity with all classes.

11 years, 1 month

Issue 526 in moose-technology: Add explicit Interface in Famix

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Milestone-4.3 New issue 526 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Add explicit Interface in Famix http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=526 We should have a FAMIXInterface.

11 years, 1 month

Re: Issue 482 in moose-technology: Use JNIPort to connect to VerveineJ

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Comment #2 on issue 482 by cy.delaunay: Use JNIPort to connect to VerveineJ http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=482 you should now use that: Gofer new url: 'www.squeaksource.com/DelaunayTmpStuffs'; package: 'JNIPort-Initialization'; load. Gofer new url: 'www.squeaksource.com/DelaunayTmpStuffs'; package: 'JNIPortExample'; load. The initialization part still has to be fixed, sometimes it works, sometimes not.

11 years, 5 months

Re: Issue 469 in moose-technology: integrate Kontractor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #4 on issue 469 by tudor.girba: integrate Kontractor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=469 What is the status of this?

11 years, 6 months

Re: Issue 437 in moose-technology: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Comment #1 on issue 437 by alexandre.bergel: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=437 Situation has been slightly improved, but this is clearly not satisfactory

11 years, 6 months

Re: Issue 396 in moose-technology: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Cc: tudor.girba Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396 I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few things. view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ] What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has clicked? It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo: What do you think? Cheers, Alexandre

12 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev February 2011