Hi all
I loaded the
- latest version of FAME
- mse-lr
- OB
- moose-all
Now when I load moose-all I get a
"FMBookMock You must resolve these dependencies before you will be
able to load these definitions: FMBookMock>>mooseButtons
FMBookMock>>viewer"
:(
Stef
Hi,
I just explored moose utilities on moose website and I found that
Package DNA had been modified?!!
I found he last version of Package blueprints (I modified this version
from more than 2 months), and I did not find Package fingerprint?
Is it the same problem that happened with Java4Moose?
thanks,
hani
hi!
Last time I checked the moose.unibe.ch website, I was surprised to see
that the Java4Moose section has disappeared from the Tools section.
This has the a smell of old backup restoration. Someone may give an
update on this?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi
I really enjoyed the dojo.
Now how can we proceed? I would really like to have a Moose up and
running in Pharo.
Doru do you have an idea when you will have time to work on FAMIX 30?
From my side I will work on the extractor and populate FAMIX-
Implementation and Famix-Smalltalk.
Stef
Hi.
I'm interested in the Squeak port ... Is it currently usable?
My goal ... define my meta-models, generate Squeak code classes + accessors
including bi-directional ones, do some meta-driven Seaside (and eventually
some Mondrian visualizations of models, if Mondrian will run in Squeak).
I've browsed the VW version of the code a few weeks ago, but do not (yet)
have a clear idea of where to start. Anything by way of a few paragraph
"getting started" guide for beginers?
Thanks,
Desmond
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moose-dev-bounces(a)iam.unibe.ch
> [mailto:moose-dev-bounces@iam.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Toon Verwaest
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:56 AM
> To: Related to the development of Moose and other related tools
> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: Dojo follow up
>
> Please regerate the FAMIX3.0 code with the code generator before doing
> other stuff. I changed the slot implementation in Fame yesterday so
> that it uses a nice <varname>Slot accessor to get to the actual slots
> instead of hacky instVarAt stuff.
>
> Just generte and only accept the methods ending in Slot ;)
>
> On (03/06/08 09:17), Tudor Girba wrote:
> > From: Tudor Girba <girba(a)iam.unibe.ch>
> > To: Related to the development of Moose and other related tools
> > <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
> > Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: Dojo follow up
> > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200
> >
> > Hi Stef,
> >
> > FAMIX 3.0 should be correct now, except that it does not have the
> > traversal methods yet.
> >
> > I will work again on generating pictures and potentially a
> > documentation on Thursday and Friday.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> >
> > > Now I cannot work on the SqueakExtractor because Famix30 is not
> > > complete.
> > > I would really a document explaining Famix 30 and a
> working version.
> > > I can hack around but it may not be the correct one at the end.
> > >
> > > Stef
> > >
> > > On May 27, 2008, at 1:22 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> I really enjoyed the dojo.
> > >> Now how can we proceed? I would really like to have a
> Moose up and
> > >> running in Pharo.
> > >> Doru do you have an idea when you will have time to work
> on FAMIX 30?
> > >>
> > >> From my side I will work on the extractor and populate FAMIX-
> > >> Implementation and Famix-Smalltalk.
> > >>
> > >> Stef
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Moose-dev mailing list
> > >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> > www.tudorgirba.com/blog
> >
> > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how
> it cannot
> > be done."
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
Hi Stef,
Unfortunately, at this moment, there is no one directly willing in
port it.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I want to know whether you plan to migrate eyesee to squeak.
>
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Moose mailing list
> Moose(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose
--
www.tudorgirba.comwww.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Problem solving should be concentrated on describing
the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."
Dear list,
today I installed Moose, and, on top of that, ClusterFinder, which
would simply refuse to work - sometimes it will choke on a "Subscript
out of bounds" immediately, sometimes it will show a growing progress
bar and then complain about the message #writeStream not being
understood (while, at the same time, "errorr!a CodeFoo.Deprecation"
messages appear).
I installed the most recent versions of Moose and ClusterFinder. What
do I have to do to make this work?
Best,
Michael
Hi Azadeh,
First, you have to create nodes to be able to draw edges.
Second, in your case, I guess the simplest thing is to use the numbers
as the models for the edges and just specify "from:" from the first
collection and "to:" from the second collection.
Perhaps something like this would work:
viewFrom: col1 to: col2
| view |
view := Mondrian.ViewRenderer new.
view node: col1 forIt: [
view nodes: col1.
view verticalLineLayout.].
view node: col2 forIt: [
view nodes: col2.
view verticalLineLayout.].
"we just created 2 nodes for the two collections and inside we added a
node for each element"
"we also laid out the nodes vertically inside each root node"
view edges: (1 to: col1 size) from: [:index | col1 at: index] to:
[:index | col2 at: index].
view open
Cheers,
Doru
On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:09 PM, azadeh wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about Mondrian .
> I want to visualize an exttraction result by ViewRenderer .
> As the result I have two OrderedCollections that have a semantic
> relation between their entities.
> Now i need to make edges from col1 index:1 to col2 index:1; col1
> index:2 to col2 index:2; in this way.
> I tried this way:
> viewfrom : col1 to:col2
> view := Smalltalk.Mondrian.ViewRenderer new.
> i := 1 .[i < (col1 size)] whileTrue:[ view1 edges: col1 from:
> [ col1 at: i] to:[col2 at:i]. i := i + 1.] .
> view open.
> or this way:
> view1 edges: col1 fromAll: [:model| col1] toAll:[:model| col2].
> ps1: the edges are from col1 to col2.
>
> What should i do please?
>
> Best,
> Azadeh
--
www.tudorgirba.comwww.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle."
