Moose-dev June 2008

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

17 participants
58 discussions

Loading Moose-All
by stephane ducasse 12 Jun '08

12 Jun '08

Hi all I loaded the - latest version of FAME - mse-lr - OB - moose-all Now when I load moose-all I get a "FMBookMock You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these definitions: FMBookMock>>mooseButtons FMBookMock>>viewer" :( Stef

3 3

MooseHome>Tools>Package DNA?
by Hani ABDEEN 12 Jun '08

12 Jun '08

Hi, I just explored moose utilities on moose website and I found that Package DNA had been modified?!! I found he last version of Package blueprints (I modified this version from more than 2 months), and I did not find Package fingerprint? Is it the same problem that happened with Java4Moose? thanks, hani

3 5

Java4Moose
by Alexandre Bergel 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

hi! Last time I checked the moose.unibe.ch website, I was surprised to see that the Java4Moose section has disappeared from the Tools section. This has the a smell of old backup restoration. Someone may give an update on this? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

2 3

Dojo follow up
by stephane ducasse 10 Jun '08

10 Jun '08

Hi I really enjoyed the dojo. Now how can we proceed? I would really like to have a Moose up and running in Pharo. Doru do you have an idea when you will have time to work on FAMIX 30? From my side I will work on the extractor and populate FAMIX- Implementation and Famix-Smalltalk. Stef

9 10

Re: Dojo follow up
by Desmond DSouza 06 Jun '08

06 Jun '08

Hi. I'm interested in the Squeak port ... Is it currently usable? My goal ... define my meta-models, generate Squeak code classes + accessors including bi-directional ones, do some meta-driven Seaside (and eventually some Mondrian visualizations of models, if Mondrian will run in Squeak). I've browsed the VW version of the code a few weeks ago, but do not (yet) have a clear idea of where to start. Anything by way of a few paragraph "getting started" guide for beginers? Thanks, Desmond > -----Original Message----- > From: moose-dev-bounces(a)iam.unibe.ch > [mailto:moose-dev-bounces@iam.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Toon Verwaest > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:56 AM > To: Related to the development of Moose and other related tools > Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: Dojo follow up > > Please regerate the FAMIX3.0 code with the code generator before doing > other stuff. I changed the slot implementation in Fame yesterday so > that it uses a nice <varname>Slot accessor to get to the actual slots > instead of hacky instVarAt stuff. > > Just generte and only accept the methods ending in Slot ;) > > On (03/06/08 09:17), Tudor Girba wrote: > > From: Tudor Girba <girba(a)iam.unibe.ch> > > To: Related to the development of Moose and other related tools > > <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch> > > Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: Dojo follow up > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200 > > > > Hi Stef, > > > > FAMIX 3.0 should be correct now, except that it does not have the > > traversal methods yet. > > > > I will work again on generating pictures and potentially a > > documentation on Thursday and Friday. > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > > > Now I cannot work on the SqueakExtractor because Famix30 is not > > > complete. > > > I would really a document explaining Famix 30 and a > working version. > > > I can hack around but it may not be the correct one at the end. > > > > > > Stef > > > > > > On May 27, 2008, at 1:22 PM, stephane ducasse wrote: > > > > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> I really enjoyed the dojo. > > >> Now how can we proceed? I would really like to have a > Moose up and > > >> running in Pharo. > > >> Doru do you have an idea when you will have time to work > on FAMIX 30? > > >> > > >> From my side I will work on the extractor and populate FAMIX- > > >> Implementation and Famix-Smalltalk. > > >> > > >> Stef > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Moose-dev mailing list > > >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > > >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Moose-dev mailing list > > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.tudorgirba.com/blog > > > > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how > it cannot > > be done." > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Moose-dev mailing list > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >

4 3

Re: [Moose] Are you planning to migrate eyesee to squeak
by Tudor Girba 06 Jun '08

06 Jun '08

Hi Stef, Unfortunately, at this moment, there is no one directly willing in port it. Cheers, Doru On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > I want to know whether you plan to migrate eyesee to squeak. > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose mailing list > Moose(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Problem solving should be concentrated on describing the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."

1 0

ClusterFinder broken?
by Michael Haupt 04 Jun '08

04 Jun '08

Dear list, today I installed Moose, and, on top of that, ClusterFinder, which would simply refuse to work - sometimes it will choke on a "Subscript out of bounds" immediately, sometimes it will show a growing progress bar and then complain about the message #writeStream not being understood (while, at the same time, "errorr!a CodeFoo.Deprecation" messages appear). I installed the most recent versions of Moose and ClusterFinder. What do I have to do to make this work? Best, Michael

4 12

Re: about Mondrian
by Tudor Girba 03 Jun '08

03 Jun '08

Hi Azadeh, First, you have to create nodes to be able to draw edges. Second, in your case, I guess the simplest thing is to use the numbers as the models for the edges and just specify "from:" from the first collection and "to:" from the second collection. Perhaps something like this would work: viewFrom: col1 to: col2 | view | view := Mondrian.ViewRenderer new. view node: col1 forIt: [ view nodes: col1. view verticalLineLayout.]. view node: col2 forIt: [ view nodes: col2. view verticalLineLayout.]. "we just created 2 nodes for the two collections and inside we added a node for each element" "we also laid out the nodes vertically inside each root node" view edges: (1 to: col1 size) from: [:index | col1 at: index] to: [:index | col2 at: index]. view open Cheers, Doru On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:09 PM, azadeh wrote: > Hi, > I have a question about Mondrian . > I want to visualize an exttraction result by ViewRenderer . > As the result I have two OrderedCollections that have a semantic > relation between their entities. > Now i need to make edges from col1 index:1 to col2 index:1; col1 > index:2 to col2 index:2; in this way. > I tried this way: > viewfrom : col1 to:col2 > view := Smalltalk.Mondrian.ViewRenderer new. > i := 1 .[i < (col1 size)] whileTrue:[ view1 edges: col1 from: > [ col1 at: i] to:[col2 at:i]. i := i + 1.] . > view open. > or this way: > view1 edges: col1 fromAll: [:model| col1] toAll:[:model| col2]. > ps1: the edges are from col1 to col2. > > What should i do please? > > Best, > Azadeh -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle."

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev June 2008