Dear all,
Last week end with the other of Doru, Toon and Stéphane we ported the
core of Moose and most of Fame into Squeak. I think these two need to
be tied up.
Mondrian seems to be on its way.
Is there any plan for this dojo?
I will arrive in Bern on Wednesday 21 in the afternoon and will leave
Saturday 24 early in the morning.
Feel free to assign me to task. I wish to have moose on Squeak.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi Said
can you tell us what you want to do?
You can get the source by following the instructions available on the
web site.
http://moose.unibe.ch/
Stef
On May 13, 2008, at 3:28 PM, said chihani wrote:
> Hello.
> My name is Chihani, i study Informatic in TU Dortmumd in Germany and
> i want analyse Moose.
> cann you give me please the guid from Moose.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage
> kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?
> mc=022220
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose mailing list
> Moose(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose
Begin forwarded message:
> From: said chihani <chihani(a)web.de>
> Date: May 13, 2008 3:28:12 PM CEDT
> To: "moose(a)iam.unibe.ch" <moose(a)iam.unibe.ch>
> Subject: [Moose] TU-Dortmund
>
> Hello.
> My name is Chihani, i study Informatic in TU Dortmumd in Germany and
> i want analyse Moose.
> cann you give me please the guid from Moose.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage
> kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?
> mc=022220
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose mailing list
> Moose(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Jonathan I. Maletic, Ph.D." <jmaletic(a)cs.kent.edu>
> Date: May 13, 2008 7:41:23 PM CEDT
> To: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>, Michael Collard <collard(a)cs.kent.edu
> >
> Subject: Re: A qustion about srcML
>
>
>>
>> Thanks. I was thinking that I could bridge it to our tools :)
>> May be this question will help me to understand:
>> when you have an AST, are the symbols resolved ? I guess not, I
>> imagine that srcML gives you the parsed text as input.
>> which is already something in C++ :)
>
> Stef,
>
> We have a separate tool to do name resolution, symbol table etc.
> Name resolution is particularly difficult and this tool is not as
> robust as the translator. We've not been handing the name
> resolution stuff out until will do some more testing. As you said C
> ++ is hell. We plan to get these other tools cleaned up over the
> summer.
>
> So just running the translator you get un-resolved names.
>
> Jonathan
>
>>
>>> Stef,
>>>
>>> We markup up down to the identifier level. But expressions are
>>> not marked completely. That is identifiers in expressions are
>>> marked but the entire AST for the expression is not done. So all
>>> parameter lists are marked etc.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, everything else is marked up including preprocessor
>>> statements, templates, and comments. Nothing is removed from the
>>> original code code. You can get the exact original code back
>>> including whitespace.
>>>
>>> Does this help?
>>>
>>>
>>> It's fast and robust. A number of folks are using it including
>>> some people in industry. So it actually works as opposed to just
>>> a prototype.
>>
>> I like that.
>> C++ is so much a hell. A friend of mine tried CDT and the code is
>> really strange (you have to walk several structure to go from a
>> method to its class).
>>
>> Stef
>
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Jonathan I. Maletic, Ph.D." <jmaletic(a)cs.kent.edu>
> Date: May 13, 2008 6:08:52 PM CEDT
> To: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>, Michael Collard <collard(a)cs.kent.edu
> >
> Subject: Re: A qustion about srcML
>
> Stef,
>
> We markup up down to the identifier level. But expressions are not
> marked completely. That is identifiers in expressions are marked
> but the entire AST for the expression is not done. So all parameter
> lists are marked etc.
>
> Otherwise, everything else is marked up including preprocessor
> statements, templates, and comments. Nothing is removed from the
> original code code. You can get the exact original code back
> including whitespace.
>
> Does this help?
>
> It's fast and robust. A number of folks are using it including some
> people in industry. So it actually works as opposed to just a
> prototype.
>
> Jonathan
>
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Hi john
>>
>> I wanted to know what srcML extract exactly from languages. Do you
>> have a description somewhere.
>> This was not obvious from the homepage.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>
There are 5 days left until the deadline of FAMOOSr 2008:
http://moose.unibe.ch/events/famoosr2008
We are looking for new ideas (2 page) and experience reports (4 pages)
related to Moose, FAMIX and reengineering in general. The
contributions can be either theoretical or practical and it can be
academic or industry oriented.
The ultimate goal is to spawn a discussion regarding the current and
future directions in Moose, FAMIX and reengineering.
FAMOOSr organizers
Hi Doru,
if I can help after the Dojo with documentation, Q&A, testing or coding, let me know. I could spend about 4 hours a week for the next 3 months.
cu
Pascal Vollmer
Pascal Vollmer
Email: pascal.vollmer(a)ieee.org
Jetzt komfortabel bei Arcor-Digital TV einsteigen: Mehr Happy Ends, mehr Herzschmerz, mehr Fernsehen! Erleben Sie 50 digitale TV Programme und optional 60 Pay TV Sender, einen elektronischen Programmführer mit Movie Star Bewertungen von TV Movie. Außerdem, aktuelle Filmhits und spannende Dokus in der Arcor-Videothek. Infos unter www.arcor.de/tv
Hi,
We will organize a Moose Dojo during May 22-23
http://moose.unibe.ch/events/2008-04-22-dojo
This dojo will be focused on one single topic:
--- Porting Moose to Squeak ---
To make the dojo effective, I am compiling a list of tasks that should
be addressed. The goal is not to complete the port, but rather to
explore as many porting problems as possible and to identify an
interested team for the effort.
If you are interested in participating, please let me know what you
would like to work on.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.comwww.tudorgirba.com/blog
"No matter how many recipes we'll know, we'll still value a chef."
