Issue 876 in moose-technology: FAMIX: Opposite reference between BehaviouralEntity and ImplicitVariable
28 Nov
2012
28 Nov
'12
11:20 a.m.
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 876 by anne.et...(a)gmail.com: FAMIX: Opposite reference between
BehaviouralEntity and ImplicitVariable
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=876
- There is a reference between ImplicitVariable and BehaviouralEntity
(parentBehaviouralEntity) whose opposite reference is named localVariables.
However, in BehaviouralEntity, the reference named localVariables points to
LocalVariables. And there is no inheritance between ImplicitVariable and
LocalVariable.
Please fill in the labels with the following information:
* Type-Engineering
* Component-FAMIX
29 Nov
29 Nov
8:57 a.m.
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: tu...(a)tudorgirba.com
Labels: Milestone-4.7 Component-SmalltalkImporter Component-Famix
Comment #1 on issue 876 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: FAMIX: Opposite reference
between BehaviouralEntity and ImplicitVariable
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=876
Fixed and tested.
In the process, I also fixed and tested the import to ensure that implicit
variables instances are not created unnecessarily. The problem was that
when ensuring the implicit variable we got:
...
at: name ifAbsentPut: (self createSpecialVariable: name forFamixMethod:
aFAMIXMethod).
Instead we need:
at: name ifAbsentPut: [self createSpecialVariable: name forFamixMethod:
aFAMIXMethod].
It took some 10 minutes to see the problem :)
4406
days inactive
4407
days old
1 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
moose-technology＠googlecode.com