Issue 834 in moose-technology: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges
Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Milestone-4.7
New issue 834 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
To reproduce see the example below: | edges | view nodes: #(1 2 3). edges := view edgesFrom: [:each | each - 1]. view shape line color: Color red. view edges: #(3) from: [:each | each - 2] to: #yourself. view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: edges
If the user defined edges would be taken into account, the tree would appear on one line (1->2->3). Instead it appears laid out as 1->2, 1->3 .
Comment #1 on issue 834 by alexandr...@gmail.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
Fixed in Roassal 1.111. Thanks Doru!
Comment #2 on issue 834 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
Thanks. Now, the MetaBrowser works like before only on top of Roassal.
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 834 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Can you describe how userDefineEdges fit into the system ?
moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote:
Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Milestone-4.7
New issue 834 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
To reproduce see the example below: | edges | view nodes: #(1 2 3). edges := view edgesFrom: [:each | each - 1]. view shape line color: Color red. view edges: #(3) from: [:each | each - 2] to: #yourself. view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: edges
If the user defined edges would be taken into account, the tree would appear on one line (1->2->3). Instead it appears laid out as 1->2, 1->3 .
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Take into account the following visualization: http://www.themoosebook.org/book/internals/famix/meta-browser
The layout is only affected by the gray edges. Although the red edges reside in the same graph, they do not affect the position of the nodes (like this you obtain the tree as a base map and the red edges as extra details for a selected node). This is achieved by telling the layout to only consider the gray edges as "userDefinedEdges".
Cheers, Doru
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ben Coman btc@openinworld.com wrote:
Can you describe how userDefineEdges fit into the system ?
moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote:
Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Milestone-4.7
New issue 834 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: Roassal layouts do not properly take into account userDefinedEdges http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=834
To reproduce see the example below: | edges | view nodes: #(1 2 3). edges := view edgesFrom: [:each | each - 1]. view shape line color: Color red. view edges: #(3) from: [:each | each - 2] to: #yourself. view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: edges
If the user defined edges would be taken into account, the tree would appear on one line (1->2->3). Instead it appears laid out as 1->2, 1->3 .
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Ben Coman -
moose-technology＠googlecode.com -
Tudor Girba