Wow, thank you very much for looking into this. Doru On Jul 13, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Alain Plantec &lt;alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr&gt; wrote: > ok, I 've a track > With rubric, if a textArea do not have the focus but has a selection, then the first click on it give it the focus but don't deselect. > In that case, one have to click to times to have the old TextMorph behavior. > So, depending on the goal of the test, one have to send simulateClick one time or two times and not alway only one time. > I will dig more to really understand. > > > Le 13 juil. 2013 à 10:11, Alain Plantec &lt;alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr&gt; a écrit : > >> and if one add a #inspect send in a testMethod, the results are the same with the TestRunner but differ >> if one run them from Nautilus. >> As an example, with: >> ----- >> testEnteringTextInPort >> | composite textMorph | >> composite := GLMCompositePresentation new with: [ :a | a rubricText display: '' ]. >> window := composite openOn: 4. >> textMorph := self find: RubScrolledTextMorph in: window. >> textMorph simulateClick. >> self assert: textMorph activeHand keyboardFocus = textMorph textArea. >> self simulateKeyStrokes: 'hello'. >> (composite pane port: #text) value asString inspect. <-------------------------------- ** inspect added here ** >> self assert: (composite pane port: #text) value asString = 'hello' >> ---- >> by running tests from Nautilus, the inspect runs ok and the result string is 'hello'. >> but now #testAcceptKeyCanBeOverriden turns yellow >> >> by running test from the TestRunner, #testEnteringTextInPort and #testPastingUpdatesTextPort stay yellow (as without the inspect) >> and #testAcceptKeyCanBeOverriden is green >> >> Alain >> >> >> Le 2 juil. 2013 à 12:49, Tudor Girba &lt;tudor(a)tudorgirba.com&gt; a écrit : >> >>> Thanks. I got the same problem and I do not know where to start from. It's really strange. >>> >>> For those interested, the tests are in the GLMRubricTextMorphicTest class. If you run all of them repeatedly, you get some errors. If you run them individually, you do not. >>> >>> Alain: do you happen to have an insight? >>> >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk &lt;yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com&gt; wrote: >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> I hope that we can release 4.8 and move to Pharo 3.0 soon. I wanted to fix failing tests and the only one is Rubric test. I was working with it for some time, and I have no idea what's up. When you run tests separately they work fine, but when being run in a suite some test fail and failures are inflicted by test order >>> >>> Maybe someone have ideas where to look at? UI maybe? >>> >>> Uko >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> > -- www.tudorgirba.com "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, you will end up with a messy haircut."