Hi! I believe having a nice support for examples is very important. And the current effort is a nice step toward ubiquitous examples. But I feel something is weird with the current way to define an example. I may have raised that problem earlier. But since it is bugging me seriously, I raise it again :-) If I want to have an example of RTView, I can define the following method: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= RTView class>>exampleUsingView | v | v := RTView new. v add: RTBox element. v open -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Pressing on the icon will open the view in a window, great. But when I run the test, this method exampleUsingView opens the window. And I do not want that :-( Instead, I use do not use #example in the method name. But this is awkward... Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.