Hi!
I believe having a nice support for examples is very important. And the current effort is a nice step toward ubiquitous examples. But I feel something is weird with the current way to define an example.
I may have raised that problem earlier. But since it is bugging me seriously, I raise it again :-)
If I want to have an example of RTView, I can define the following method: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= RTView class>>exampleUsingView | v | v := RTView new. v add: RTBox element. v open -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Pressing on the icon will open the view in a window, great. But when I run the test, this method exampleUsingView opens the window. And I do not want that :-(
Instead, I use do not use #example in the method name. But this is awkward...
Alexandre