1 Jul
2013
1 Jul
'13
4:45 p.m.
Johan wrote:
So, yes, stick to the language spec. Some PhD student
will be glad for it at some later time!
Ok, so that problem we don't have in Delphi. There is no spec,
and all available grammars are wrong. AFAIK, most languages have either that
problem, or no significant implementations that follow the spec (c++, sql).
Chris doesn't seem opposed to a very detailed level, as long as there
are some convenience accessors in the right places. Our problem
with PetitDelphi is that there is no way to know what nodes to create,
without having a usecase for them. So we just started (like Chris, I guess)
with what we seemed to need.
Stephan
1 Jul
1 Jul
5:47 p.m.
New subject: fast job is broken
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
Johan wrote:
to
criticisms (most all of which were deserved) with some changes.
So, yes, stick to the language spec. Some PhD
student will be glad for it
at some later time!
without having a usecase for them. So we just started (like Chris, I guess)
with what we seemed to need.
Yes, that is exactly what I did. And then I responded to a certain degree Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4192
days inactive
4192
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Chris Cunningham -
Stephan Eggermont