22 Jun
2011
22 Jun
'11
3:27 p.m.
Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
23 Jun
23 Jun
12:08 a.m.
Hi,
Indeed, this looks like a bug. The issue is that the export is done only at the Fame
level, and the metrics are not described at that level.
So, we should probably define the metrics as Fame properties as well.
A ticket must be opened :).
Cheers,
Doru
On 22 Jun 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
7:53 a.m.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Indeed, this looks like a bug. The issue is that the export is done only at the Fame
level, and the metrics are not described at that level.
ok now I do not understand why the tests that covered that aspect did not show it.
So they got removed them?
;-/
Savings metrics like LOC is not something optional if we want to store model.
Stef
So, we should probably define the metrics as Fame properties as well.
A ticket must be opened :).
Cheers,
Doru
On 22 Jun 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:11 a.m.
Hi Stef,
On 23 Jun 2011, at 07:53, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hmm, I do not find any tests related to the export of metrics in the current image.
Hi,
Indeed, this looks like a bug. The issue is that the export is done only at the Fame
level, and the metrics are not described at that level.
ok now I do not understand why the tests that covered that aspect did not show it.
So they got removed them?
;-/ Savings metrics like LOC is not something optional if
we want to store model.
Sure.
Doru
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
So, we should probably define the metrics as Fame properties as well.
A ticket must be opened :).
Cheers,
Doru
On 22 Jun 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:30 p.m.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
On 23 Jun 2011, at 07:53, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I imagine but I'm sure I wrote some tests to check that a saved and reimported model
did not lose its metrics in the past
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hmm, I do not find any tests related to the export of metrics in the current image.
Hi,
Indeed, this looks like a bug. The issue is that the export is done only at the Fame
level, and the metrics are not described at that level.
ok now I do not understand why the tests that covered that aspect did not show it.
So they got removed them?
;-/ Savings metrics like LOC is not something
optional if we want to store model.
Sure.
Doru
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
So, we should probably define the metrics as Fame properties as well.
A ticket must be opened :).
Cheers,
Doru
On 22 Jun 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
9:29 a.m.
At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were very large,
slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load (this was a
long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE
importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing from
infusion/verveinej).
Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional? That would be the way to
go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select
group of data by package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE
file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
3:32 p.m.
At one point metrics were described in the meta-model
but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all
metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the
Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data,
like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to export/import
functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as
part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I
would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
14 Jul
14 Jul
1:51 p.m.
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing
this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most
of the metrics can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they
cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the
metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we
cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we
can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level
and like that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could
have a huge MSE, I implemented a filter and you can select the metrics to be
exported through a wizard. It solves, for example, the lose of information
with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and:
Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of
Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
wrote:
At one point
metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files
were very large, slow
to export (because you have to compute all metrics),
and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics
and other data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame
package 'Metrics', then we can select group of
data by package. I would
still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot
be
computed by moose.
> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests
to make sure that this was
correct.
>
> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be
exported
to other formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2:26 p.m.
Hi Andre,
I took a quick look. Annotating the metrics as real MSE properties is definitely the way
to go. We should integrate that in FAMIX-Extensios. I did not take a closer look, but from
a distance I also like the visitor solution for exporting a filtered model.
Now, I would like to provide a bit of feedback for the way you implemented this:
- You created a complete new repository that is specific to this task. This is a problem
because afterwards, this repository will die because it does not really contain a project.
For spike implementations like this, I would suggest to either use MoosePlayground, or
have your own in which you play with multiple smaller tasks. This makes it easier to track
the changes.
- To affect the changes on the FAMIX classes you copied the methods in your package. This
means that when I load your package, I will override my methods. This makes it hard and
error-prone to integrate them afterwards. Instead, you should have simply published the
FAMIX-Extensions package in your repository and apply changes on that one. Afterwards,
merging would have been straightforward. Could you try that?
- You created 2 packages in Monticello:
'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions'
'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE'
The problem is that when you will have both loaded in the image and you will try to save
'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions', you will also save in the same package the code
from the ''Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE' category. That is because
Monticello relies on string pattern matching to map image categories to packages (bad
thing, but that is what we have now).
So, the rule of thumb is: never nest categories with '-'
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 13:51, Andre Hora wrote:
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
At one point metrics were described in the
meta-model but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute
all metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other
data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by
package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5:56 p.m.
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
At one point metrics were described in the
meta-model but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute
all metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other
data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by
package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
7:46 p.m.
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the
last Merlin and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
package: 'FameExportProperties';
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr
wrote:
> grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just returning to this topic.
> >
> > As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing
> this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most
> of the metrics can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they
> cannot.
> > For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the
> metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we
> cannot recalculate them.
> >
> > So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but
> we can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame
> level and like that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we
> could have a huge MSE, I implemented a filter and you can select the metrics
> to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for example, the lose of
> information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
> >
> > To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel
> and: Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last
> version of Merlin.
> >
> > Gofer new
> > squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
> > package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
> > package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
> > load.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
> stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr wrote:
> > >
At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE
> files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all
> metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove
> them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still
> handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing from
> infusion/verveinej).
> >
> > but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
> >
> > > Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
> >
> > I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
> > : select what to save
> > : select the format
> > -> tab separated, mse, xml
> >
> >
> > > That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame
> package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would
> still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi guys
> > >>
> > >> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot
> be computed by moose.
> > >> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was
> correct.
> > >>
> > >> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be
> exported to other formats.
> > >>
> > >> Stef
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Moose-dev mailing list
> > >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > Simon Denier
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andre Hora
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
--
Andre Hora
8:08 p.m.
andre
are you at the lab tomorrow?
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
package: 'FameExportProperties';
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev At one point metrics were described in the
meta-model but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute
all metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other
data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by
package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
8:16 p.m.
Up to now no, but I can go :)
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr
wrote:
> andre
>
> are you at the lab tomorrow?
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes Stef.
> > Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use
> the last Merlin and updated the meta-model):
> >
> > Gofer new
> > squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
> > package: 'FameExportMSE';
> > package: 'FameExportProperties';
> > package: 'Famix-Extensions';
> > load.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
> stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr wrote:
> > grab
me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Just returning to this topic.
> > >
> > > As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are
> losing this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that
> most of the metrics can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they
> cannot.
> > > For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose
> the metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we
> cannot recalculate them.
> > >
> > > So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important,
> but we can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame
> level and like that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we
> could have a huge MSE, I implemented a filter and you can select the metrics
> to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for example, the lose of
> information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
> > >
> > > To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel
> and: Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last
> version of Merlin.
> > >
> > > Gofer new
> > > squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
> > > package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
> > > package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
> > > load.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
> stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr wrote:
> > >
> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE
> files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all
> metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove
> them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still
> handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing from
> infusion/verveinej).
> > >
> > > but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
> > >
> > > > Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
> > >
> > > I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
> > > : select what to save
> > > : select the format
> > > -> tab separated, mse, xml
> > >
> > >
> > > > That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame
> package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would
> still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi guys
> > > >>
> > > >> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that
> cannot be computed by moose.
> > > >> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that
this
> was correct.
> > > >>
> > > >> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to
be
> exported to other formats.
> > > >>
> > > >> Stef
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Moose-dev mailing list
> > > >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Simon Denier
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andre Hora
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andre Hora
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
--
Andre Hora
11:05 p.m.
Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev At one point metrics were described in the
meta-model but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute
all metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other
data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by
package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi guys
I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other
formats.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
15 Jul
15 Jul
12:23 p.m.
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev At one point metrics were described in the
meta-model but then MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute
all metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from
the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other
data, like for example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
Now is the interface to select what to
export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
That would be the way to go. Then describe
metrics as part of a Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by
package. I would still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by
moose.
> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
>
> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to
other formats.
>
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
12:35 p.m.
I added a couple of tests to describe the situation:
VerveineJModelTest>>testCyclomaticComplexity
VerveineJModelTest>>testNumberOfStatements
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:23, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were very
large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load (this
was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although
the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing
from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package
'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like to be
able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>
>
> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be
computed by moose.
>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
>>
>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to
other formats.
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon Denier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
1:14 p.m.
humm..yes in fact.
The problem is that, now in the description <MSEProperty:
#numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number> the first argument must be the name of
the method (and consequently the name of the property in Fame description),
while, for example, in <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code'
description:'The number of lines of code in a class'> the first argument may
have a different name, that's it?
I will have a look.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
I added a couple of tests to describe the situation:
VerveineJModelTest>>testCyclomaticComplexity
VerveineJModelTest>>testNumberOfStatements
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:23, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between
the
names of metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a
metric used
to communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame
description.
Could you take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Yes Stef.
>> Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to
use
the last Merlin and updated the meta-model):
>>
>> Gofer new
>> squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
>> package: 'FameExportMSE';
>
> I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second
step of
the exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would
need another layout.
>
>> package: 'FameExportProperties';
>
> Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here
is the
label in the first wizard step when we have to choose type of
exported file.
>
>> package: 'Famix-Extensions';
>
> This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> load.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>> grab me next time I'm around because
I want to have a look at that.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Just returning to this topic.
>>>
>>> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are
losing this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that
most of the metrics can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they
cannot.
>>> For example, when exporting in Moose
a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose
the metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and
numberOfStatements (NOS) and we
cannot recalculate them.
>>>
>>> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important,
but we can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame
level and like that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we
could have a huge MSE, I implemented a filter and you can select the metrics
to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for example, the lose of
information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
>>>
>>> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a
MooseModel and: Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the
last version of Merlin.
>>>
>>> Gofer new
>>> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
>>> load.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>> At one point metrics were
described in the meta-model but then MSE
files were very large, slow to export
(because you have to compute all
metrics), and slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove
them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although the MSE importer can still
handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing from
infusion/verveinej).
>>>
>>> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>>>
>>>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>>>
>>> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
>>> : select what to save
>>> : select the format
>>> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>>>
>>>
>>>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame
package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would
still like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys
>>>>>
>>>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that
cannot be computed by moose.
>>>>> Are metrics saved? I remember
writing tests to make sure that this
was correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be
exported to other formats.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon Denier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Andre Hora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
1:17 p.m.
It is not enough. Also the lookup should be by the short name.
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 13:14, Andre Hora wrote:
humm..yes in fact.
The problem is that, now in the description <MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type:
#Number> the first argument must be the name of the method (and consequently the name
of the property in Fame description), while, for example, in <property: #WLOC longName:
'Number of lines of code' description:'The number of lines of code in a
class'> the first argument may have a different name, that's it?
I will have a look.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
I added a couple of tests to describe the situation:
VerveineJModelTest>>testCyclomaticComplexity
VerveineJModelTest>>testNumberOfStatements
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:23, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Live like you mean it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just returning to this topic.
>
> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this
information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can
be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
>
> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can
change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we
can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
>
> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
>
> Gofer new
> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
> load.
>
> regards,
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were
very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load
(this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export
(although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when
importing from infusion/verveinej).
>
> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>
>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>
> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
> : select what to save
> : select the format
> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>
>
>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package
'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like to be
able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>
>>
>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be
computed by moose.
>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was
correct.
>>>
>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported
to other formats.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon Denier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Andre Hora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
9:19 p.m.
doru
I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as essential =
non recomputable so that we can garantee that
we always save them.
what do you think about that?
Stef
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
Hello,
Just returning to this topic.
As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this information
when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can be
recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can change
them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we can
export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were very
large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load (this
was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export (although
the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when importing
from infusion/verveinej).
but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
: select what to save
: select the format
-> tab separated, mse, xml
> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package
'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like to be
able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>
>
> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be
computed by moose.
>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct.
>>
>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to
other formats.
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon Denier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:27 p.m.
Hi,
I do not understand what "non recomputable" means. Right now, everything that is
not derived is saved. Why is this not enough? I need a use case to understand :)
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
doru
I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as essential =
non recomputable so that we can garantee that
we always save them.
what do you think about that?
Stef
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hello,
Yes Stef.
Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last Merlin
and updated the meta-model):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
load.
regards,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
Stef
On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just returning to this topic.
>
> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this
information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can
be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
>
> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can
change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we
can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
>
> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and: Import /
Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
>
> Gofer new
> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
> load.
>
> regards,
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were
very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load
(this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export
(although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when
importing from infusion/verveinej).
>
> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>
>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>
> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
> : select what to save
> : select the format
> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>
>
>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package
'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like to be
able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>
>>
>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be
computed by moose.
>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was
correct.
>>>
>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported
to other formats.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon Denier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Andre Hora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Andre Hora
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
9:47 p.m.
Hi doru
LOC
cyclomatic complexity for java method
I do not understand what "non recomputable"
means. Right now, everything that is not derived is saved.
was it fixed?
the last time I checked the metrics where not saved.
is numberOfMethod derived?
Stef
Why is this not enough? I need a use case to
understand :)
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
doru
I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as essential =
non recomputable so that we can garantee that
we always save them.
what do you think about that?
Stef
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes Stef.
> Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last
Merlin and updated the meta-model):
>
> Gofer new
> squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
> package: 'FameExportMSE';
I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
> package: 'FameExportProperties';
Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label in
the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
> package: 'Famix-Extensions';
This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
> load.
>
> regards,
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
> grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just returning to this topic.
>>
>> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this
information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can
be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
>> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the metrics
cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot recalculate them.
>>
>> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we can
change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that we
can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I implemented a
filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It solves, for
example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO and NOS.
>>
>> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and:
Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
>>
>> Gofer new
>> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
>> load.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files were
very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to load
(this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export
(although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when
importing from infusion/verveinej).
>>
>> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>>
>>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>>
>> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
>> : select what to save
>> : select the format
>> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>>
>>
>>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame package
'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like to be
able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be
computed by moose.
>>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was
correct.
>>>>
>>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be
exported to other formats.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Denier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andre Hora
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Andre Hora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:54 p.m.
Hi,
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
LOC
cyclomatic complexity for java method
This is what Andre did and it is in Famix-Extensions.
I do not understand what "non
recomputable" means. Right now, everything that is not derived is saved.
was it fixed? the last time I checked the metrics where not saved.
They are now because of the recent changes.
is numberOfMethod derived?
Right now it is not derived:
numberOfMethods
<MSEProperty: #numberOfMethods type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of methods in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #NOM
computedAs: [self methods size]
But probably it should be. LOC on the other hand should definitely not be derived.
Cheers,
Doru
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
Why is this not enough? I need a use case to
understand :)
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev doru
I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as essential =
non recomputable so that we can garantee that
we always save them.
what do you think about that?
Stef
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Andre,
I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names of
metric properties. For example:
FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
" <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
<MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could you
take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Yes Stef.
>> Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the last
Merlin and updated the meta-model):
>>
>> Gofer new
>> squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
>> package: 'FameExportMSE';
>
> I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of the
exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
>
>> package: 'FameExportProperties';
>
> Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the label
in the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
>
>> package: 'Famix-Extensions';
>
> This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> load.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>> grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Just returning to this topic.
>>>
>>> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing this
information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics can
be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
>>> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the
metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot
recalculate them.
>>>
>>> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but we
can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like that
we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I
implemented a filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It
solves, for example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO
and NOS.
>>>
>>> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel and:
Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of Merlin.
>>>
>>> Gofer new
>>> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
>>> load.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE files
were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow to
load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE export
(although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for example when
importing from infusion/verveinej).
>>>
>>> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>>>
>>>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>>>
>>> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
>>> : select what to save
>>> : select the format
>>> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>>>
>>>
>>>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame
package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like
to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys
>>>>>
>>>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that
cannot be computed by moose.
>>>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this
was correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be
exported to other formats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon Denier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andre Hora
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andre Hora
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Beauty is where we see it."
>
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:29 p.m.
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Ok I was confused.
I was not thinking that derived was the opposite of non recomputable but if this is the
case then this is good
Hi,
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
ok
He filtered also only number and I think that this should not be like that.
We can also want to save other types of properties
Hi doru
LOC
cyclomatic complexity for java method
This is what Andre did and it is in Famix-Extensions. I do not understand what "non
recomputable" means. Right now, everything that is not derived is saved.
was it fixed? the last time I checked the metrics where not
saved.
They are now because of the recent changes.
is numberOfMethod derived?
Right now it is not derived:
numberOfMethods
<MSEProperty: #numberOfMethods type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of methods in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #NOM
computedAs: [self methods size]
But probably it should be. LOC on the other hand should definitely not be derived.
Cheers,
Doru
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Why is this not enough? I need a use case to
understand :)
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev doru
I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as essential =
non recomputable so that we can garantee that
we always save them.
what do you think about that?
Stef
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the names
of metric properties. For example:
>
> FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
> " <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code' description:
> 'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
>
> <MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
> <MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
>
> ^self
> lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
> computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
>
>
> The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used to
communicate with external parsers.
>
> So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description. Could
you take care of that?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yes Stef.
>>> Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use the
last Merlin and updated the meta-model):
>>>
>>> Gofer new
>>> squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
>>> package: 'FameExportMSE';
>>
>> I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step of
the exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another layout.
>>
>>> package: 'FameExportProperties';
>>
>> Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is the
label in the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
>>
>>> package: 'Famix-Extensions';
>>
>> This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> load.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>> grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Just returning to this topic.
>>>>
>>>> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are losing
this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the metrics
can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
>>>> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose the
metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot
recalculate them.
>>>>
>>>> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important, but
we can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and like
that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I
implemented a filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It
solves, for example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO
and NOS.
>>>>
>>>> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a MooseModel
and: Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last version of
Merlin.
>>>>
>>>> Gofer new
>>>> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
>>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
>>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
>>>> load.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then MSE
files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and slow
to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE
export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for
example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
>>>>
>>>> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>>>>
>>>>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>>>>
>>>> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
>>>> : select what to save
>>>> : select the format
>>>> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a Fame
package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still like
to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi guys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that
cannot be computed by moose.
>>>>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that
this was correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to
be exported to other formats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Simon Denier
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andre Hora
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andre Hora
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Beauty is where we see it."
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:45 p.m.
Hi,
On 15 Jul 2011, at 22:29, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Ok I was confused.
I was not thinking that derived was the opposite of non recomputable but if this is the
case then this is good
derived means that it should not be stored because it can be recomputed from the
information available in the model. Anything that is not declared as derived gets saved.
Doru
Hi,
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
ok
He filtered also only number and I think that this should not be like that.
We can also want to save other types of properties
Hi doru
LOC
cyclomatic complexity for java method
This is what Andre did and it is in Famix-Extensions. I do not understand what "non
recomputable" means. Right now, everything that is not derived is saved.
was it fixed? the last time I checked the metrics where not
saved.
They are now because of the recent changes.
is numberOfMethod derived?
Right now it is not derived:
numberOfMethods
<MSEProperty: #numberOfMethods type: #Number>
<MSEComment: 'The number of methods in a class'>
^self
lookUpPropertyNamed: #NOM
computedAs: [self methods size]
But probably it should be. LOC on the other hand should definitely not be derived.
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Why is this not enough? I need a use case to
understand :)
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Jul 2011, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> doru
>
> I was discussing with andre and I would like to be able to tag a property as
essential = non recomputable so that we can garantee that
> we always save them.
> what do you think about that?
>
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> I just saw that the latest Moose build failed because of mismatch between the
names of metric properties. For example:
>>
>> FAMIXType>>numberOfLinesOfCode
>> " <property: #WLOC longName: 'Number of lines of code'
description:
>> 'The number of lines of code in a class'>"
>>
>> <MSEProperty: #numberOfLinesOfCode type: #Number>
>> <MSEComment: 'The number of lines of code in a class'>
>>
>> ^self
>> lookUpPropertyNamed: #numberOfLinesOfCode
>> computedAs: [self methodsGroup sum: #numberOfLinesOfCode]
>>
>>
>> The name of the metric should be WLOC. This is historical and it is a metric used
to communicate with external parsers.
>>
>> So, all in all we need the name of the old properties in the Fame description.
Could you take care of that?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 14 Jul 2011, at 19:46, Andre Hora wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Yes Stef.
>>>> Doru thanks for the feedback. You can check the code in (remember to use
the last Merlin and updated the meta-model):
>>>>
>>>> Gofer new
>>>> squeaksource: 'HoraExp';
>>>> package: 'FameExportMSE';
>>>
>>> I tried this one. The idea is nice, but the problem is that the second step
of the exporter wizard is too tall and goes out of my screen. We would need another
layout.
>>>
>>>> package: 'FameExportProperties';
>>>
>>> Very cool. This needs to go in Moose-Finder. The only thing to fix here is
the label in the first wizard step when we have to choose type of exported file.
>>>
>>>> package: 'Famix-Extensions';
>>>
>>> This is cool. I already copied it to the Moose repo. It's that easy :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>>> load.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>> grab me next time I'm around because I want to have a look at that.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Andre Hora wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just returning to this topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> As most of the metrics are not described at the Fame level we are
losing this information when we export a model to MSE in Moose. We know that most of the
metrics can be recalculated in the model, but in some cases they cannot.
>>>>> For example, when exporting in Moose a Java (VerveineJ) model we lose
the metrics cyclomaticComplexity (CYCLO) and numberOfStatements (NOS) and we cannot
recalculate them.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, to avoid it, I changed some metrics (some I think are important,
but we can change them if we integrate in Moose) to be described at the Fame level and
like that we can export them into a MSE. In this case, as the we could have a huge MSE, I
implemented a filter and you can select the metrics to be exported through a wizard. It
solves, for example, the lose of information with VerveineJ if you decide to export CYCLO
and NOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> To try you can run the script below and the right-click in a
MooseModel and: Import / Export -> Export model to MSE with metrics. Use the last
version of Merlin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gofer new
>>>>> squeaksource: 'FameImportExportEx';
>>>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions';
>>>>> package: 'Fame-ImportExport-Extensions-MSE';
>>>>> load.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>> At one point metrics were described in the meta-model but then
MSE files were very large, slow to export (because you have to compute all metrics), and
slow to load (this was a long time ago). We decided to remove them from the Smalltalk MSE
export (although the MSE importer can still handle metrics and other data, like for
example when importing from infusion/verveinej).
>>>>>
>>>>> but even in Smalltalk you need to keep loc
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now is the interface to select what to export/import functional?
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not know but this is something you we should definitively do
>>>>> : select what to save
>>>>> : select the format
>>>>> -> tab separated, mse, xml
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be the way to go. Then describe metrics as part of a
Fame package 'Metrics', then we can select group of data by package. I would still
like to be able to not export metrics in the MSE file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 juin 2011, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi guys
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC
that cannot be computed by moose.
>>>>>>> Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that
this was correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition it would be good to be able to select some
metrics to be exported to other formats.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Simon Denier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andre Hora
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andre Hora
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "Beauty is where we see it."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:58 p.m.
11:30 p.m.
"I do not understand what "non recomputable" means. Right now, everything
that is not derived is saved. Why is this not enough? I need a use case to
understand :)"
Right now yes, but in a near future (working in FameExportMSE) we will
choose which properties we want to export, and the point is that you can
choose not exporting a "non recomputable" property and it may not be good. I
think Stef talking about that :)
So, I think that there are two points: (1) you can choose not export a
property/entity because you want to deal with a smaller model - OK
(2) you can choose not export a property/entity because you just don't want
a big file (in this case you can miss metrics unaware, eg, CYCLO and NOS)
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
derived means that it should not be stored because it can be recomputed from the
information available in the model. Anything that is not declared
as derived gets saved.
--
Andre Hora
Doru
ok
we wrote a test that shows that a model saved and reloaded as the same
entities and properties than the one it originates from.
Now since andre filters and keep only Number we may have problems.
We should check that because I would save everything that is not derived
regardless of its type.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4909
days inactive
4932
days old
25 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andre Hora -
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba