9 Sep
2011
9 Sep
'11
3:55 p.m.
Hi,
In C/C++ you can define something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
To be able to model this in FAMIX, I introduced FAMIXTypeAlias in Famix-C. However, now I
think we have to move it to the Core because of the following reason.
Suppose we have something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
SubType: TypeAlias
When enumerating the subclasses of Type, I need to get:
- TypeAlias
- SubType
To do this, when traversing with subclassesDo: I need to take into account the typeAliases
associated with each type. This means that the notion of TypeAliases must be in the Core.
I hope I explained the matter. Please let me know if you see other alternatives.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
9 Sep
9 Sep
5:09 p.m.
Looks reasonable and cheap.
I will work on the canalyzer in a couple of weeks.
Alexandre
On 9 Sep 2011, at 10:55, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
In C/C++ you can define something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
To be able to model this in FAMIX, I introduced FAMIXTypeAlias in Famix-C. However, now I
think we have to move it to the Core because of the following reason.
Suppose we have something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
SubType: TypeAlias
When enumerating the subclasses of Type, I need to get:
- TypeAlias
- SubType
To do this, when traversing with subclassesDo: I need to take into account the
typeAliases associated with each type. This means that the notion of TypeAliases must be
in the Core.
I hope I explained the matter. Please let me know if you see other alternatives.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
10 Sep
10 Sep
8:45 a.m.
On Sep 9, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
In C/C++ you can define something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
To be able to model this in FAMIX, I introduced FAMIXTypeAlias in Famix-C. However, now I
think we have to move it to the Core because of the following reason.
Suppose we have something like this:
typedef Type TypeAlias;
SubType: TypeAlias
When enumerating the subclasses of Type, I need to get:
- TypeAlias
- SubType
To do this, when traversing with subclassesDo: I need to take into account the
typeAliases associated with each type. This means that the notion of TypeAliases must be
in the Core.
doru we are about to generate a doc for famix 30, it would be nice that this kind of
discussions get written in the class comment/description so that we do not lose it.
I hope I explained the matter. Please let me know if you see other alternatives.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4852
days inactive
4853
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba