18 Apr
2010
18 Apr
'10
11:46 p.m.
Hi,
I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also based
on the level at which the item resides.
An example can be found here:
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel
Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and
selectors (both being represented by symbols) in the same tree :).
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
19 Apr
19 Apr
10:49 a.m.
this is really cool.
Stef
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also based on the level at
which the item resides.
An example can be found here:
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel
Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and selectors (both being
represented by symbols) in the same tree :).
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:52 a.m.
Very cool indeed, I can use that.
What do I do if I have different kinds of objects per level?
Lukas
On 19 April 2010 10:49, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
this is really cool.
Stef
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
Hi,
I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also based on the level at
which the item resides.
An example can be found here:
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel
Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and selectors (both being
represented by symbols) in the same tree :).
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
20 Apr
20 Apr
8:55 a.m.
Hi Lukas,
On 19 Apr 2010, at 10:52, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Very cool indeed, I can use that.
What do I do if I have different kinds of objects per level?
You have to take care of that somehow in the children block. The level
option is one possibility to distinguish between objects. Another one
is a "isKindOf:", but that you can do yourself. It would be
interesting to offer other means of mapping (maybe something that
builds a map behind the scene), but I would not know how to do that.
If you have ideas, I would be happy to hear them :).
Cheers,
Doru
Lukas
On 19 April 2010 10:49, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
this is really cool.
Stef
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also
based on the level at which the item resides.
An example can be found here:
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel
Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and
selectors (both being represented by symbols) in the same tree :).
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at
them."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:08 a.m.
Very cool
indeed, I can use that.
What do I do if I have different kinds of objects per level?
You have to take care of that somehow in the children block. The level
option is one possibility to distinguish between objects. Another one is a
"isKindOf:", but that you can do yourself. It would be interesting to offer
other means of mapping (maybe something that builds a map behind the scene),
but I would not know how to do that. If you have ideas, I would be happy to
hear them :).
I was thinking/expecting more something along a meta-model for trees.
For now I guess the current implementation is fine, I just need to
implement some unique selector in all the objects that will be part of
the tree that returns their children.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
9:12 a.m.
Hi,
On 20 Apr 2010, at 09:08, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Aha, ok. I was quickly looking at the code but couldn't figure out how
the specification of the different selectors at different levels
worked :-)
Yes, when you have distinct types you can just either dispatch to
them, or use an isKindOf: as a shortcut. The problem comes when you do
not have distinct types (for various strange reasons) but you still
want to treat the objects differently.
What do you mean by a meta-model for trees? This is what the children:
block does. What else would you like?
Cheers,
Doru
Very cool indeed, I can use that.
What do I do if I have different kinds of objects per level?
You have to take care of that somehow in the children block. The
level
option is one possibility to distinguish between objects. Another
one is a
"isKindOf:", but that you can do yourself. It would be interesting to offer
other means of mapping (maybe something that builds a map behind
the scene),
but I would not know how to do that. If you have ideas, I would be
happy to
hear them :).
I was thinking/expecting more something along a meta-model for trees.
For now I guess the current implementation is fine, I just need to
implement some unique selector in all the objects that will be part of
the tree that returns their children. Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
5362
days inactive
5364
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Lukas Renggli -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba