Hi,
Indeed, the only dependency to MooseDevelopment was the use of the
SCG.Moose namespace.
So, I moved all classes in a namespace called StoreIt, and as the
importer uses some collection classes from CodeFoo, StoreIt also
imports the CodeFoo namespace. StoreIt is just a temporary name, and
you can rename it if you want.
I also removed the dependency to MooseDevelopment and added
dependency to CodeFooDevelopment.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
That's an error, MooseStore should be a stand
alone. Actually, even
the name is wrong, it was meant and developed as a standalone
package, not related to Moose in any way. Hence, go ahead an remove
that prereq.
cheers,
AA
On 6 Jun 2007, at 9:31 , Mircea Lungu wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have seen that MooseDevelopment is set as a prerequisite to
MooseStore even if there seems to be no obvious reason for it.
I would like to use the model defined in MooseStore also for the
Project Observatory but it seems awkward to ask the user to load all
moose when all that is actually needed is the MooseStore package...
Can you see a solution? :)
Mircea.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Tudor Girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Every thing should have the right to be different."