25 Sep
2010
25 Sep
'10
11:49 a.m.
here is my summary
fame is a minimal meta meta model ( 4 or 5 classes): we use it describe other model (such
as Famix)
based on fame you can load and save model.
Magritte is a meta data driven framework.
you describe specific entity and the tools interpret it.
On Sep 25, 2010, at 11:24 AM, François Tanguy wrote:
Hi,
being a end user, I am bit confused with these 2 frameworks: Fame and Magritte.
There are both meta-meta-models. So what make them different from a conceptual point of
view ?
For my models, I would like to have the persistency for free (from Fame) and the UI
edition and model validation for free (from Magritte).
Today I must write two times the description of my language (one in Fame and one in
Magritte), and it feels like I would need only one description.
Any info on this would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Francois
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
25 Sep
25 Sep
9:20 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-project] Fame vs Magritte
Would it be a good idea to have a bridge between the two ?
Like generating magritte descriptions from the Fame pragmas.
Then we could imagine to have a generic editor for a metamodel and serialization... (like
in EMF)
I wrote a very basic piece of code that does the transformation from Fame to Magritte in
some very specific use case and that is something that is definitely possible.
What do you think ?
Le 25 sept. 2010 à 11:49, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
here is my summary
fame is a minimal meta meta model ( 4 or 5 classes): we use it describe other model (such
as Famix)
based on fame you can load and save model.
Magritte is a meta data driven framework.
you describe specific entity and the tools interpret it.
On Sep 25, 2010, at 11:24 AM, François Tanguy wrote:
Hi,
being a end user, I am bit confused with these 2 frameworks: Fame and Magritte.
There are both meta-meta-models. So what make them different from a conceptual point of
view ?
For my models, I would like to have the persistency for free (from Fame) and the UI
edition and model validation for free (from Magritte).
Today I must write two times the description of my language (one in Fame and one in
Magritte), and it feels like I would need only one description.
Any info on this would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Francois
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5202
days inactive
5202
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
François Tanguy -
Stéphane Ducasse