If Metacello handles well cycle, then why not to add a reference to Roassal. I will try to have access to the repository. It is not mine. Alexandre > Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around. > > development should be better a baseline than this > > development: spec > "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. > The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" > <symbolicVersion: #development > > > "For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. > Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" > spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'. > > I can fix it if you give me access.... > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev