hi alex
the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal. Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around.
development should be better a baseline than this
development: spec "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" <symbolicVersion: #development >
"For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'.
I can fix it if you give me access....
Stef
the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal.
If Metacello handles well cycle, then why not to add a reference to Roassal.
I will try to have access to the repository. It is not mine.
Alexandre
Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around.
development should be better a baseline than this
development: spec "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" <symbolicVersion: #development >
"For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'.
I can fix it if you give me access....
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Alex
Look at the difference between XMLSupport and XMLWriter, XMLParser. Tell me if I should explain it.
We should avoid to mix ConfigurationAsProject and ConfigurationAsDependencies.
But you tell me and I have no problem to fork my own. I will not spend time to manage a system that I cannot get clean.
Stef
the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal.
If Metacello handles well cycle, then why not to add a reference to Roassal.
I will try to have access to the repository. It is not mine.
Alexandre
Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around.
development should be better a baseline than this
development: spec "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" <symbolicVersion: #development >
"For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'.
I can fix it if you give me access....
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev