On Mar 10, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
Hi again,
I am still exploring moose and my immediate usage is to identify dead code
(classes, methods, variables). There are two issues I am facing with
false-positive.
1.) In java a lot is configured/instantiated via the usage of XML. E.g. the
Log4J configuration happens via xml, another example would be the menu
structure of an Eclipse plugin.
What would be the easiest way to represent these usages in a .mse file?
I do not think that it should be done at the level of mse but the meta model
Is there a tool to merge two .mse files or combine
them?
Not for now.
But depending on the interest it could be done.
2.) The attribute/field detection of verveineJ does
not see all variable
usages, e.g. it appears that it can not resolve a "this.foo" properly (e.g. in
a constructor, or in an anonymous class).
do you have an example.
I will try to have a minimal
testcase to show this issue (as my time permits).
Thx
holger
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev