3 Oct
2011
3 Oct
'11
5:31 p.m.
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools
New issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Constructors should be marked with isConstructor.
3 Oct
3 Oct
5:55 p.m.
Is it a new property ?
I downloaded an image this morning and I can't find it?
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology(a)googlecode.com
À: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
Envoyé: Lundi 3 Octobre 2011 17:31:03
Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools
New issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Constructors should be marked with isConstructor.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4 Oct
4 Oct
7:26 a.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Milestone-4.6
Comment #1 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Actually, this property is an ancient one, but it looks to not be in a
clear state.
FAMIXMethod>>isConstructor is a derived property from FAMIX>>kind which in
its turn is an enumeration of:
- constructor
- getter
- setter
- constant
So, VerveineJ should export something like:
(FAMIX.Method
...
(kind 'constructor')
)
In essence, Moose can also deal with the following export (that is why I
said it is not so clean):
(FAMIX.Method
...
(isConstructor true)
)
In any case, independently from this issue, isConstructor should indeed be
described properly in Fame.
19 Oct
19 Oct
12:44 p.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Labels: -Component-ExternalTools Component-VerveineJ
Comment #2 on issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
2:56 p.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
actually this onehas been solved for a week or two.
I just did not create the tests for it.
(and I forgot to mention it too)
I will solve this now
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology(a)googlecode.com
À: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Octobre 2011 12:44:09
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Labels: -Component-ExternalTools Component-VerveineJ
Comment #2 on issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:22 p.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 721 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
VerveineJ now add a (kind 'constructor') when required
Also added a test
24 Oct
24 Oct
9:23 a.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #4 on issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
It seems that using the latest version this information does not appear in
the model. So, I am reopening the issue.
9 Nov
9 Nov
7:34 a.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Cc: anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Comment #5 on issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Ok. It looks like this issue is solved now for the regular cases.
However, stub constructors (both of stub and of non-stub classes) are still
not marked as constructors.
11 Feb
11 Feb
11 a.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-4.6 Milestone-4.7
Comment #6 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
13 Apr
13 Apr
4:17 p.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Cc: -anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Comment #7 on issue 721 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
fixed and tested
9:58 p.m.
New subject: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
Comment #8 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark
constructors
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Thanks
4636
days inactive
4829
days old
10 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
moose-technology＠googlecode.com -
Nicolas Anquetil