Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools
New issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Constructors should be marked with isConstructor.
Is it a new property ? I downloaded an image this morning and I can't find it?
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Lundi 3 Octobre 2011 17:31:03 Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools
New issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Constructors should be marked with isConstructor.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Updates: Owner: tudor.gi...@gmail.com Labels: Milestone-4.6
Comment #1 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Actually, this property is an ancient one, but it looks to not be in a clear state.
FAMIXMethod>>isConstructor is a derived property from FAMIX>>kind which in its turn is an enumeration of: - constructor - getter - setter - constant
So, VerveineJ should export something like: (FAMIX.Method ... (kind 'constructor') )
In essence, Moose can also deal with the following export (that is why I said it is not so clean): (FAMIX.Method ... (isConstructor true) )
In any case, independently from this issue, isConstructor should indeed be described properly in Fame.
Updates: Labels: -Component-ExternalTools Component-VerveineJ
Comment #2 on issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
actually this onehas been solved for a week or two. I just did not create the tests for it. (and I forgot to mention it too)
I will solve this now
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: moose-technology@googlecode.com À: moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Octobre 2011 12:44:09 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors Updates: Labels: -Component-ExternalTools Component-VerveineJ
Comment #2 on issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 721 by anquetil...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
VerveineJ now add a (kind 'constructor') when required Also added a test
Updates: Status: Started
Comment #4 on issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
It seems that using the latest version this information does not appear in the model. So, I am reopening the issue.
Updates: Cc: anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #5 on issue 721 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Ok. It looks like this issue is solved now for the regular cases.
However, stub constructors (both of stub and of non-stub classes) are still not marked as constructors.
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.6 Milestone-4.7
Comment #6 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates: Status: Fixed Cc: -anquetil...@gmail.com
Comment #7 on issue 721 by anquetil...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
fixed and tested
Comment #8 on issue 721 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721
Thanks
-
moose-technology＠googlecode.com -
Nicolas Anquetil