On 22 janv. 09, at 20:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
probably.
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> It's: FAMIXBehaviouralEntity>>outgoingAccesses
>
> Perhaps we should just name them accesses.
I would keep outgoingAccesses and provide an alias named accesses,
much like belongsTo redirects calls to parentClass or other property.
Sometimes it helps to have the direction of the relationship in the
name, sometimes you dont care.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
in FAMIX2>>Method>>accesses
accesses
<MSEProperty: #accesses type: #FAMIX2Access opposite: #accessedIn>
<multivalued>
"all variable accesses contained in receiver"
accesses isNil ifTrue: [ accesses := OrderedCollection new ].
^ accesses
what is the equivalence in FAMIX30?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon