On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
Isnt the FormsBuilder exactly supposed to do that? Because fixing node position with
scatterplotlayout feels like a hack to me.
I'm confused
Do you mean that the new scatterplot interface looks a hack?
So yes we have to reimplement package blueprint but it is also an occasion to
cleanup/rewrite the code.
But this is a question of time. Give me infinite amount of time and this is not a problem
Stef
On 25 nov. 2009, at 08:18, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
But, there is a MOScatterplotLayout. It's just that Alex decided to implement the
layout differently by placing the x: and y: computation directly in the layout instead of
allowing each node to define its position.
You can see examples of the two APIs at MOLayoutTest>>testScatterplotLayout and
MOLayoutTest>>obsoleteTestScatterplot.
I actually think the current implementation is not a very good idea because you might
have different kinds of nodes that should be placed based on different considerations.
In any case, unfortunately the current Mondrian is not fully compatible with the VW one,
and there is no particular process to make it so.
Cheers,
Doru
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:38, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
we started to port package blueprint to pharo and apparently there is no
ScatterPlotLayout in Mondrian in Pharo
Is there a reason?
What is the interface conformance between VW and pharo Mondrian?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev