SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

About instance variable metaclass

Re: New MooseBrowser

Simon Denier

7 Nov 2008 7 Nov '08

6:17 p.m.

I'm looking into the SmalltalkMethodVisitor for Famix3 and in particular how it builds FamixInvocation entity However there is a receivingVariable attribute in Famix2::Invocation, for which I cant find a substitute in FamixInvocation. How should I deal with this data? SmalltalkMethodVisitor>>acceptMessageNode: (...) aMessageNode receiver isVariable ifTrue: [invocation setReceivingVariable: (self resolve: aMessageNode receiver name)]. (...) -- Simon

Show replies by date

Tudor Girba

8 Nov 8 Nov

12:10 a.m.

New subject: SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

The correspondent is FAMIXInvocation>>receiver. Cheers, Doru On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Simon Denier wrote:

...

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Every thing has its own flow."

Stéphane Ducasse

9:02 a.m.

New subject: SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

really I thought that receivingVariable was only set when it was a variable and not an expression. So receiver will only refer to a variable? Stef On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

...

The correspondent is FAMIXInvocation>>receiver. Cheers, Doru On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Simon Denier wrote:

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Every thing has its own flow." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Tudor Girba

9:55 a.m.

New subject: SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

The receiver is a NamedEntity right now, but perhaps it should be Entity to also enable one to hook in an Expression entity later on. Doru On Nov 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

really I thought that receivingVariable was only set when it was a variable and not an expression. So receiver will only refer to a variable? Stef On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

The correspondent is FAMIXInvocation>>receiver. Cheers, Doru On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Simon Denier wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."

Stéphane Ducasse

10:01 a.m.

New subject: SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

On Nov 8, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

...

The receiver is a NamedEntity right now, but perhaps it should be Entity to also enable one to hook in an Expression entity later on.

ok for the moment we keep it simple. ok should I translate that into receiver = self, super, localVa, classVar, instVar, Class.... Stef

...

Doru On Nov 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

really I thought that receivingVariable was only set when it was a variable and not an expression. So receiver will only refer to a variable? Stef On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

The correspondent is FAMIXInvocation>>receiver. Cheers, Doru On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Simon Denier wrote:

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Tudor Girba

10:07 a.m.

New subject: SqMoose: mapping Famix2::Invocation::receivingVariable into Famix3::Invocation ?

Yep. Doru On Nov 8, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

On Nov 8, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

The receiver is a NamedEntity right now, but perhaps it should be Entity to also enable one to hook in an Expression entity later on.

ok for the moment we keep it simple. ok should I translate that into receiver = self, super, localVa, classVar, instVar, Class.... Stef

Doru On Nov 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

really I thought that receivingVariable was only set when it was a variable and not an expression. So receiver will only refer to a variable? Stef On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

The correspondent is FAMIXInvocation>>receiver. Cheers, Doru On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Simon Denier wrote: > I'm looking into the SmalltalkMethodVisitor for Famix3 and in > particular how it builds FamixInvocation entity > > However there is a receivingVariable attribute in > Famix2::Invocation, > for which I cant find a substitute in FamixInvocation. How > should I > deal with this data? > > SmalltalkMethodVisitor>>acceptMessageNode: > (...) > aMessageNode receiver isVariable > ifTrue: > [invocation > setReceivingVariable: (self resolve: aMessageNode receiver > name)]. > (...) > > > -- > Simon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Every thing has its own flow." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."

5888

days inactive

5889

days old

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

Manage subscription

5 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

Simon Denier
Stéphane Ducasse
Tudor Girba