8 Feb
2013
8 Feb
'13
5:42 p.m.
Hello all,
Today, we worked on moving Moose on pharo2.0. We needed to update a few
baselines because some packages were already present in Pharo2.0. For
example,
- RPackage is already present in Pharo 2.0, so no need to load it in the
image.
- PetitParser loads Glamour, which loads NECompletion and NEC does not have
configuration for pharo2.0.
We decided to move all the moose code to STHub before porting it to 2.0 so
that we can save changes somewhere. Some projects are created in STHub in
the Moose team:
Fame (Moved all code from FAME on squeaksource to STHub, updated
configurationOf to load from STHub + creating a version with latest dev.)
Glamour (in the process of downloading packages but its taking long, but
glamour will be difficult because it has dependencies with other projects
so may be it should be moved incrementally. Doru, I think you can take lead
on that since you know the project better)
Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next
week)
PetitParser (will be moved next week too)
For people interested in moving code, here are the scripts for fetch and
push.
==================================
"fetch all FAME packages from their repository"
| go |
go := Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fame'.
((go allResolved select: [:aPac |'*Fam*' match: aPac packageName ])
do: [:each |
self crLog: each packageName.
go package: each packageName.
Transcript show: each printString ; cr.
go fetch.]).
======================================
"commit all FAME packages into the smalltalkhub FAME project"
|go repo|
repo := MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'Moose'
project: 'Fame'
user: 'XXX'
password: 'XXX'.
go := Gofer new.
go repository: repo.
(((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'package-cache')
allFiles select: [:each | '*Fame*.mcz' match: each basename])
groupedBy: [:each | (each base copyUpToLast: $-) ])
keys do: [:name | go package: name; push]
Now, moving to Pharo2.0 is important, so it will be good to kill this
boring task by working collaboratively :-)
Usman
P.S: The last step of moving every project is to create a new baseline to
point to STHub for the project and preferably create a version with that
baseline.
8 Feb
8 Feb
9:13 p.m.
Hi,
Thanks Usman for starting to do this. My net was down since yesterday, and did not see
your other email. Indeed, we first have to move to StHub before doing anything.
However, we have to do it systematically:
- We make all repositories on squeaksource readonly
- We move only what is needed
- We double check that what we wanted to move was actually moved
Regarding PetitParser, please do not move it yet. This is the project of Lukas, and first
we have to ask him nicely about the plans he has with it. Perhaps he does not want to have
it somewhere else in which case we have to see how we deal with having it working on the
latest Pharo. In any case, the first step is to ask the main author.
Regarding Moose, I am not sure what you are downloading, but if you just say Moose-Core
and FAMIX, I am a bit skeptical. Please let's not deal with this hastily.
I will start looking into this next week.
Btw, we still did not release 4.7 :).
Cheers,
Doru
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
Today, we worked on moving Moose on pharo2.0. We needed to update a few baselines because
some packages were already present in Pharo2.0. For example,
- RPackage is already present in Pharo 2.0, so no need to load it in the image.
- PetitParser loads Glamour, which loads NECompletion and NEC does not have configuration
for pharo2.0.
We decided to move all the moose code to STHub before porting it to 2.0 so that we can
save changes somewhere. Some projects are created in STHub in the Moose team:
Fame (Moved all code from FAME on squeaksource to STHub, updated configurationOf to load
from STHub + creating a version with latest dev.)
Glamour (in the process of downloading packages but its taking long, but glamour will be
difficult because it has dependencies with other projects so may be it should be moved
incrementally. Doru, I think you can take lead on that since you know the project better)
Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next week)
PetitParser (will be moved next week too)
For people interested in moving code, here are the scripts for fetch and push.
==================================
"fetch all FAME packages from their repository"
| go |
go := Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fame'.
((go allResolved select: [:aPac |'*Fam*' match: aPac packageName ])
do: [:each |
self crLog: each packageName.
go package: each packageName.
Transcript show: each printString ; cr.
go fetch.]).
======================================
"commit all FAME packages into the smalltalkhub FAME project"
|go repo|
repo := MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'Moose'
project: 'Fame'
user: 'XXX'
password: 'XXX'.
go := Gofer new.
go repository: repo.
(((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'package-cache')
allFiles select: [:each | '*Fame*.mcz' match: each basename])
groupedBy: [:each | (each base copyUpToLast: $-) ])
keys do: [:name | go package: name; push]
Now, moving to Pharo2.0 is important, so it will be good to kill this boring task by
working collaboratively :-)
Usman
P.S: The last step of moving every project is to create a new baseline to point to STHub
for the project and preferably create a version with that baseline.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
9:36 p.m.
Hi,
Thanks Usman for starting to do this. My net was down since yesterday, and did not see
your other email. Indeed, we first have to move to StHub before doing anything.
However, we have to do it systematically:
- We make all repositories on squeaksource readonly
- We move only what is needed
why?
For each project we should take all the history.
- We double check that what we wanted to move was
actually moved
Indeed we have (and will) creating a version with exact version for all the configuration
for 1.4.
Then we have (and will) created a new baseline to point to smalltalkhub.
Then we will create a new baseline + version for 2.0.
Now there are differences between the latest baseline and the default one and this is
annoying.
Regarding PetitParser, please do not move it yet. This
is the project of Lukas, and first we have to ask him nicely about the plans he has with
it. Perhaps he does not want to have it somewhere else in which case we have to see how we
deal with having it working on the latest Pharo. In any case, the first step is to ask the
main author.
Sure! Ask lukas.
Now for projects we use for real we cannot rely on a server that may disappear tomorrow.
We are building synectique and we will build a lot of parsers and infrastructure using
PetitParser, so we (as a community)
should have a way to store extensions and this should be in a logical place. There is not
even an inbox on petitParser source (or we do not find it)
In addition redoing and checking all the configurationof will take us a lot of energy
so we should control the places where the project are stored or that authors are reactive
because we may have to change some information.
Regarding Moose, I am not sure what you are
downloading,
Glamour
but if you just say Moose-Core and FAMIX, I am a bit
skeptical.
???
Please let's not deal with this hastily.
yes well. We should start one day and it was today.
I will start looking into this next week.
Btw, we still did not release 4.7 :).
yes we know. Now if we want to give feedback to pharo 2.0 about problems and get a chance
to see them fixed we should move.
Cheers,
Doru
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
Today, we worked on moving Moose on pharo2.0. We needed to update a few baselines because
some packages were already present in Pharo2.0. For example,
- RPackage is already present in Pharo 2.0, so no need to load it in the image.
- PetitParser loads Glamour, which loads NECompletion and NEC does not have configuration
for pharo2.0.
We decided to move all the moose code to STHub before porting it to 2.0 so that we can
save changes somewhere. Some projects are created in STHub in the Moose team:
Fame (Moved all code from FAME on squeaksource to STHub, updated configurationOf to load
from STHub + creating a version with latest dev.)
Glamour (in the process of downloading packages but its taking long, but glamour will be
difficult because it has dependencies with other projects so may be it should be moved
incrementally. Doru, I think you can take lead on that since you know the project better)
Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next week)
PetitParser (will be moved next week too)
For people interested in moving code, here are the scripts for fetch and push.
==================================
"fetch all FAME packages from their repository"
| go |
go := Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fame'.
((go allResolved select: [:aPac |'*Fam*' match: aPac packageName ])
do: [:each |
self crLog: each packageName.
go package: each packageName.
Transcript show: each printString ; cr.
go fetch.]).
======================================
"commit all FAME packages into the smalltalkhub FAME project"
|go repo|
repo := MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'Moose'
project: 'Fame'
user: 'XXX'
password: 'XXX'.
go := Gofer new.
go repository: repo.
(((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'package-cache')
allFiles select: [:each | '*Fame*.mcz' match: each basename])
groupedBy: [:each | (each base copyUpToLast: $-) ])
keys do: [:name | go package: name; push]
Now, moving to Pharo2.0 is important, so it will be good to kill this boring task by
working collaboratively :-)
Usman
P.S: The last step of moving every project is to create a new baseline to point to STHub
for the project and preferably create a version with that baseline.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know
her."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9 Feb
9 Feb
6:59 p.m.
Hi,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
I wanted to say that we should only take the packages that are being used right now, and
not all the cruft that exists in the repositories. We can move the obsolete packages into
an obsolete repository in StHub.
Furthermore, given that some repositories should be split (like the Moose one), we have to
take care how we do it.
Yes, in the future, we should remove the default: and only rely on the #development
symbolic version.
If PetitParser, and Moose in general, is so important for you, it would be great to get
some feedback from time to time :).
What is with Glamour? In the end, I understood that you will not move it, and that I
will.
This is what Usman wrote:
"Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next
week)"
So, from this mail, I do not know what will be moved.
I understand the urge.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
Hi,
Thanks Usman for starting to do this. My net was down since yesterday, and did not see
your other email. Indeed, we first have to move to StHub before doing anything.
However, we have to do it systematically:
- We make all repositories on squeaksource readonly
- We move only what is needed
why?
For each project we should take all the history. - We double
check that what we wanted to move was actually moved
Indeed we have (and will) creating a version with exact version for all the configuration
for 1.4.
Then we have (and will) created a new baseline to point to smalltalkhub.
Then we will create a new baseline + version for 2.0.
Now there are differences between the latest baseline and the default one and this is
annoying. Regarding
PetitParser, please do not move it yet. This is the project of Lukas, and first we have to
ask him nicely about the plans he has with it. Perhaps he does not want to have it
somewhere else in which case we have to see how we deal with having it working on the
latest Pharo. In any case, the first step is to ask the main author.
Sure! Ask lukas.
Now for projects we use for real we cannot rely on a server that may disappear tomorrow.
We are building synectique and we will build a lot of parsers and infrastructure using
PetitParser, so we (as a community)
should have a way to store extensions and this should be in a logical place. There is not
even an inbox on petitParser source (or we do not find it) In addition redoing and checking all the
configurationof will take us a lot of energy
so we should control the places where the project are stored or that authors are reactive
because we may have to change some information.
Sure. Btw, this effort was performed, it's just that given that not many people
bothered, I ended up doing it.
Regarding
Moose, I am not sure what you are downloading,
Glamour but if you
just say Moose-Core and FAMIX, I am a bit skeptical.
??? Please
let's not deal with this hastily.
yes well. We should start one day and it was today. I will start
looking into this next week.
Btw, we still did not release 4.7 :).
yes we know. Now if we want to give feedback to pharo 2.0 about problems and get a chance
to see them fixed we should move. Cheers,
Doru
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hello all,
Today, we worked on moving Moose on pharo2.0. We needed to update a few baselines because
some packages were already present in Pharo2.0. For example,
- RPackage is already present in Pharo 2.0, so no need to load it in the image.
- PetitParser loads Glamour, which loads NECompletion and NEC does not have configuration
for pharo2.0.
We decided to move all the moose code to STHub before porting it to 2.0 so that we can
save changes somewhere. Some projects are created in STHub in the Moose team:
Fame (Moved all code from FAME on squeaksource to STHub, updated configurationOf to load
from STHub + creating a version with latest dev.)
Glamour (in the process of downloading packages but its taking long, but glamour will be
difficult because it has dependencies with other projects so may be it should be moved
incrementally. Doru, I think you can take lead on that since you know the project better)
Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next week)
PetitParser (will be moved next week too)
For people interested in moving code, here are the scripts for fetch and push.
==================================
"fetch all FAME packages from their repository"
| go |
go := Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fame'.
((go allResolved select: [:aPac |'*Fam*' match: aPac packageName ])
do: [:each |
self crLog: each packageName.
go package: each packageName.
Transcript show: each printString ; cr.
go fetch.]).
======================================
"commit all FAME packages into the smalltalkhub FAME project"
|go repo|
repo := MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'Moose'
project: 'Fame'
user: 'XXX'
password: 'XXX'.
go := Gofer new.
go repository: repo.
(((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'package-cache')
allFiles select: [:each | '*Fame*.mcz' match: each basename])
groupedBy: [:each | (each base copyUpToLast: $-) ])
keys do: [:name | go package: name; push]
Now, moving to Pharo2.0 is important, so it will be good to kill this boring task by
working collaboratively :-)
Usman
P.S: The last step of moving every project is to create a new baseline to point to STHub
for the project and preferably create a version with that baseline.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know
her."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
9:13 p.m.
I wanted to say that we should only take the packages that are being used right now, and
not all the cruft that exists in the repositories. We can move the obsolete packages into
an obsolete repository in StHub.
sure this is what we are doing.
Furthermore, given that some repositories should be
split (like the Moose one), we have to take care how we do it.
Indeed.
- We double check that what we wanted to move was
actually moved
Indeed we have (and will) creating a version with exact version for all the configuration
for 1.4.
Then we have (and will) created a new baseline to point to smalltalkhub.
Then we will create a new baseline + version for 2.0.
Now there are differences between the latest baseline and the default one and this is
annoying. Regarding PetitParser, please do not move it yet. This
is the project of Lukas, and first we have to ask him nicely about the plans he has with
it. Perhaps he does not want to have it somewhere else in which case we have to see how we
deal with having it working on the latest Pharo. In any case, the first step is to ask the
main author.
Sure! Ask lukas.
Now for projects we use for real we cannot rely on a server that may disappear tomorrow.
We are building synectique and we will build a lot of parsers and infrastructure using
PetitParser, so we (as a community)
should have a way to store extensions and this should be in a logical place. There is not
even an inbox on petitParser source (or we do not find it) In addition
redoing and checking all the configurationof will take us a lot of energy
so we should control the places where the project are stored or that authors are reactive
because we may have to change some information.
Sure. Btw, this effort was performed, it's just that given that not many people
bothered, I ended up doing it. Regarding Moose, I am not sure what you are
downloading,
Glamour > but if you
just say Moose-Core and FAMIX, I am a bit skeptical.
This is what Usman wrote:
"Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next
week)"
So, from this mail, I do not know what will be moved. Please let's not deal with this hastily.
yes well. We should start one day and it was today. I will
start looking into this next week.
Btw, we still did not release 4.7 :).
yes we know. Now if we want to give feedback to pharo 2.0 about problems and get a chance
to see them fixed we should move.
9:30 p.m.
New subject: communicating experiences [was: Moose on pharo 2.0 -> moving it STHub]
Hi,
No, I do not think that you are hiding changes. I just see that there is no communication
about the experience. Here are some examples:
- Did you use the PetitParser browser? If yes, were there bugs, issues? For example, Jan
used it for a couple of days and found 3 issues with it.
- Did you happen to have any particular problem with expressing parsers?
- How did you deal with performance when parsing large code bases?
- Did you enjoy using Moose at all? If yes, what part of it? :)
Anything, really. It just boosts the morale knowing that all the work is not it in vain
:).
On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:13 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote:
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
If
PetitParser, and Moose in general, is so important for you, it would be great to get some
feedback from time to time :).
I think that you are again thinking that we are hidding changes that we may have done
but anything that we do on moose is PUBLIC. for petit parser guillaume extended it and
send the code to lukas
but lukas preferred not to add it in the petit parser project.
10 Feb
10 Feb
12:20 p.m.
New subject: communicating experiences [was: Moose on pharo 2.0 -> moving it STHub]
On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
No, I do not think that you are hiding changes. I just see that there is no communication
about the experience. Here are some examples:
- Did you use the PetitParser browser? If yes, were there bugs, issues? For example, Jan
used it for a couple of days and found 3 issues with it.
I will ask guillaume.
- Did you happen to have any particular problem with
expressing parsers?
Not really :)
- How did you deal with performance when parsing large
code bases?
Not that I heard
- Did you enjoy using Moose at all? If yes, what part
of it? :)
Yes
Anything, really. It just boosts the morale knowing that all the work is not it in vain
:).
We are moving :)
Stef
On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:13 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote:
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
If
PetitParser, and Moose in general, is so important for you, it would be great to get some
feedback from time to time :).
I think that you are again thinking that we are hidding changes that we may have done
but anything that we do on moose is PUBLIC. for petit parser guillaume extended it and
send the code to lukas
but lukas preferred not to add it in the petit parser project. 
11 Feb
11 Feb
8:04 a.m.
New subject: communicating experiences [was: Moose on pharo 2.0 -> moving it STHub]
2013/2/10 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr>
Not at all
No problem about performance, the longer parsing we had was 15 minutes long
for a more than a million lines of code system. This time is completely
acceptable for us.
yes and especially petitParser which is in my opinion the best tool
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
*Guillaume Larcheveque*
On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
I'm not using a lot PetitParser browser, only when I encounter a big
problem. Usually, I write some tests and just implement rules.
Hi,
No, I do not think that you are hiding changes. I just see that there is
no
communication about the experience. Here are some examples:
- Did you use the PetitParser browser? If yes,
were there bugs, issues?
For example, Jan used it for a couple of days and found 3
issues with it.
I will ask guillaume.
- Did you happen to have any particular problem
with expressing parsers?
Not really :)
- How did you deal with performance when parsing
large code bases?
Not that I heard
- Did you enjoy using Moose at all? If yes, what
part of it? :)
Yes
Anything, really. It just boosts the morale knowing that all the work is
not it in
vain :).
We are moving :)
Stef
On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:13 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr>
wrote:
>> If PetitParser, and Moose in general, is so important for you, it
would be
great to get some feedback from time to time :).
>
> I think that you are again thinking that we are hidding changes that we
may
have done
> but anything that we do on moose is PUBLIC.
for petit parser guillaume
extended it and send the code to lukas
but lukas
preferred not to add it in the petit parser project.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
9:55 a.m.
On 02/08/2013 09:13 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Usman for starting to do this. My net was down since yesterday, and did not see
your other email. Indeed, we first have to move to StHub before doing anything.
However, we have to do it systematically:
- We make all repositories on squeaksource readonly
- We move only what is needed
- We double check that what we wanted to move was actually moved
Regarding PetitParser, please do not move it yet. This is the project of Lukas, and first
we have to ask him nicely about the plans he has with it. Perhaps he does not want to have
it somewhere else in which case we have to see how we deal with having it working on the
latest Pharo. In any case, the first step is to ask the main author.
OK
we are ready to do it here.
It's your call (& Lukas').
nicolas
Regarding Moose, I am not sure what you are
downloading, but if you just say Moose-Core and FAMIX, I am a bit skeptical. Please
let's not deal with this hastily.
I will start looking into this next week.
Btw, we still did not release 4.7 :).
Cheers,
Doru
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
Hello all,
Today, we worked on moving Moose on pharo2.0. We needed to update a few baselines because
some packages were already present in Pharo2.0. For example,
- RPackage is already present in Pharo 2.0, so no need to load it in the image.
- PetitParser loads Glamour, which loads NECompletion and NEC does not have configuration
for pharo2.0.
We decided to move all the moose code to STHub before porting it to 2.0 so that we can
save changes somewhere. Some projects are created in STHub in the Moose team:
Fame (Moved all code from FAME on squeaksource to STHub, updated configurationOf to load
from STHub + creating a version with latest dev.)
Glamour (in the process of downloading packages but its taking long, but glamour will be
difficult because it has dependencies with other projects so may be it should be moved
incrementally. Doru, I think you can take lead on that since you know the project better)
Moose (FAMIX + Moose-Core, downloading packages, will be committing next week)
PetitParser (will be moved next week too)
For people interested in moving code, here are the scripts for fetch and push.
==================================
"fetch all FAME packages from their repository"
| go |
go := Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fame'.
((go allResolved select: [:aPac |'*Fam*' match: aPac packageName ])
do: [:each |
self crLog: each packageName.
go package: each packageName.
Transcript show: each printString ; cr.
go fetch.]).
======================================
"commit all FAME packages into the smalltalkhub FAME project"
|go repo|
repo := MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'Moose'
project: 'Fame'
user: 'XXX'
password: 'XXX'.
go := Gofer new.
go repository: repo.
(((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'package-cache')
allFiles select: [:each | '*Fame*.mcz' match: each basename])
groupedBy: [:each | (each base copyUpToLast: $-) ])
keys do: [:name | go package: name; push]
Now, moving to Pharo2.0 is important, so it will be good to kill this boring task by
working collaboratively :-)
Usman
P.S: The last step of moving every project is to create a new baseline to point to STHub
for the project and preferably create a version with that baseline.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know
her."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4332
days inactive
4335
days old
8 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Guillaume Larcheveque -
Nicolas Anquetil -
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti