Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Milestone-4.7
New issue 806 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
If you do:
view nodes: #(1 2) forEach: [ :each | view shape label. view nodes: ({each * 10 . (each * 100)}). view treeLayout. ]. view edgesFromAssociations: {10 -> 100. 20 -> 200}.
The inner nodes are not laid out in a tree. The reason is that the edges are stored in the parent node that defines them, rather than in the most specific common parent of the from and to nodes.
We got the same problem in Mondrian.
Comment #1 on issue 806 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
Alex, any news on this one?
Comment #2 on issue 806 by alexandr...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
No, but you're putting pressure on me. I will work on it asap.
Comment #3 on issue 806 by alexandr...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
Done! Fixed in Roassal 1.67
Updates: Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 806 by alexandr...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #5 on issue 806 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Roassal does not store edges in the proper place http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=806
nice