18 Oct
2008
18 Oct
'08
8:44 a.m.
The problem is that there is a lot of crap in EMF we do not want :)
I will check what I can do with their code.
Stef
On Oct 17, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I was
wondering which meta models you have expressed in FAME?
we have FAMIX30. Now did you give a try to model EMOF?
Now do you think that it would be possible to redo the import
of EMOF sara and pierrick did but using FAME?
In principle, it could be done and it would be cool to see it done.
It is sad to see their code rot. However it would require more glue
code than before, since the gap between FM3 and EMF is larger than
between Meta's EMOF and EMF. With Meta, 80% of EMF was already there,
with Fame its about 20%. There are two approaches to bridge this gap,
either you re-implement the missing 80% (as they did back then with
Meta) or you define a (meta)metamodel transformation from FM3 to EMF
and back. I donnu which is the better choice...
cheers,
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev