[Moose-dev] Re: Using Moose outside of source assessment context?

Hi, On 29/12/16 07:31, Udo Schneider wrote: Sorry. I will fix it soon. This are slow days for family and friends at the end of year, but I'll let you know as soon as is fixed. Use the fossil repo for Grafoscopio, at http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/ticket I was using pandoc before for writing my PhD thesis before (now I have migrated to LaTeX) with the key advantage of using of @keywords for Zotero bibliography integration and I need compatibility with my own past :-). Also markdown is widely spread compared to Pillar, with scholar efforts to use it, like scholmd [1][2] and a wider community of current practitioners. Pandoc is a strong suite for working with markdown and extending it, covering most writing needs, including footnotes, academic bibliography support (which is poorly or not covered at all in most markup languages), importing and exporting to several formats (as you can see on [3] at bottom) and possibilities to hack it with several languages via Abstract Syntax Trees using JSON exchange language[4]. By supporting Pandoc I think I will cover my own needs for academic writing in several scenarios and compel a wider audience of present and future researchers, as key population for Grafoscopio. [1] http://scholmd.org/ [2] http://scholmd.org/basic_setup/what-is-scholarly-markdown.html [3] http://pandoc.org/ [4] http://pandoc.org/scripting.html Cheers, Offray