18 Mar
2009
18 Mar
'09
9:28 a.m.
I have always encountered troubles understanding the maelstrom famix2/
famix3/fame. Shame on me, I probably did not spend enough time on
reading paper and trying them out.
I removed FAMIXFunction since Simon told me that the core was meant to
not be manually reprogrammed. Since I have no idea how to describes
FAMIXFunction in Fame, I am playing on the safe side.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 17 Mar 2009, at 23:46, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
I saw that you removed FAMIXFunction from FAMIX-Core. Is there a
particular reason for this?
But, there is a larger issue here. FAMIX-Core is not meant to be
programmed, but instead it should be generate-able from the MSE
specification of FAMIX. So, basically a test should be to create an
MSE from the descriptions from FAMIX-Core and then regenerate
exactly the same classes back.
Like this, we can make sure that it remains portable and in sync
(via Fame) with implementations in other languages.
To deal with the implementation details, there is a Famix-
Implementation package.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it
cannot be done."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.