9 Aug
2013
9 Aug
'13
3:48 p.m.
On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I already tested it with Moose and it works. Snapstocello should reproduce exactly a
given image, and this should include dirty packages. The problem is that the moose
packages are not dirty, so it would be hard for Snapshotcello to know if the dirty
packages are due to the target versions or something else.
The packages are dirty in the Moose image on jenkins.
Are you trying with Pharo 2.0?
Did you try with empty package cache?
Because I'm retrying with a clean Pharo20 image.
In fact I have three problems:
- MooseAlgos repo is not Moose but MooseAlgos and I have to check why.
- I have problem with Metacallo not having the repositories set up and then it cannot
resolve packages
- Dependencies order (when I have empty package -
I have Metanool-Core that depends from MooseEntity
:(
Stef
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:26, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
Hi doru
I like the interface much better than the moose reloader :)
Else
- what about dirty packages that are not in the configuration tree? I would not handle
them to force people to get clean
Did you try to rebuild Moose using it?
I will ;)
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev