[Moose-dev] Re: [ann] gt diagrammer

On 9 Apr 2018, at 11:36, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: 2018-04-09 11:23 GMT+02:00 Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel(a)gmail.com>om>: Hi, For the record, View class, a root class of all visual elements in Android 27 is 26'488 lines of code. It didn't hover prevent it from being used on more than 2 billion devices :) Remind me, please: what is the budget of Google for the ongoing maintenance of Android? The core of Bloc is just 14k lines of code. It would be nice to know how many lines of code should be considered too much, 5k, 7.43k or 10k. For a non-rendering core? 2k.

Thierry Cheers, Alex On 9 April 2018 at 11:12, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: 2018-04-09 11:02 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com>om>: On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: 2018-04-09 9:14 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>om>: Well, from the usage of it, I've seen nothing that doesn't fit into the yagt. I've seen that field evolve and try clever things, really different things, and Bloc does not look like one of thoses. Look, from the point of view of the man of the art, it doesn't seems like a breakthrough. ​Do we need a breakthrought for UI ? No ! We need something that works that's it, stable software with good documentation and tests. After that people can build the next-UI if they want, but this is build on solid foundations. Agreed. And this is where it is critical. I used Morphic since Self 3.0, beginning of my PhD (1994, I think), followed it to the beginning of Squeak (1998). When I came back to Pharo in 2011, I was horrified by what it has became: a monster of thousands over thousands of buggy lines. And now I see a replacement, that, before going into production, is already at 45k lines? And with a planned, huge dependency on the GUI lib of another project? Do you imagine how it will be, 10 years down the line? Do you think it will be the stable foundation you're looking for? Compared to other smalltalk-based solutions, yes, it may be seen as an improvement. I think you underestimate how advanced that field has been / is, and how far behind the state of the art are industrial solutions. There is only one development in the Smalltalk space in GUI that is worthy of interest for me: the anti-aliasing of Juan Vuletich. It would have so much impact overall (remove all dependencies on external libs, remove the need to do font anti-aliasing, scrap thousands of lines of slow and ugly Smalltalk code, simplify the FreeType infrastructure, remove MBs of external librairies, ensure long-term porting ease / code evolution). M ​aybe this was a breakthrought, but how many users ? Very few users. Juan has not yet implemented it. Regards, Thierry ​ ​Regards,​ -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (SU/IRD/UY1) "Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute." http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev