Hi,
Yes, I saw the activity in the GitHub repositories. Unfortunately, the concrete path is not communicated and as a consequence we cannot contribute.
So funny from you. I could have said: "we communicate by chat and we have no roadmap” :) but this is not true: I can reexplain our plans the number of times it is necessary.
May I remind you that Pavel presented his work at ESUG during two years and that you came at Lille in September to discuss with us. Nothing has changed since then. We just communicate less because we are focusing on Pharo70 and preparing Pharo80a.
We created Releaser and this can be used to reliably release nested projects residing in different repositories. I believe the reason why everything is in on repository in Moose was to limit the different repositories problem. Perhaps that can be revisited now.
I do not think so. We pay a too large burden and energy to fake modularity. Moose is not moving enough to deserve this. I do not know what are the limits of releaser to be able to pronounce myself.
As for the new UI: what do you have specifically in mind?
Exactly what I told you in September/October. Get rid of Glamour (since it is not maintained and we want to be able to debug our tools) and (re)-write a new Moose UI using a new version of Spec. So we are working on Spec2.0 and cleaning Moose.
Stef
Cheers, Doru
On Dec 29, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
Thanks doru. We would like to release Moose 70 with the two years of work of Pavel for the metamodel and all the current effort to package Moose. With Pharo80, we are also working on new Moose UI (since Glamour is not maintained and we need something better) so that we can build fast analysis tools. I would like to get some momentum around the new tooling because we need to rebuild all the UI.
Stef
Hi,
The mails we send here or on the Pharo mailing list about GT are limited to announcements and replies related to issues and questions that people raise. We do this mostly so that we do not create an unnecessary schism and keep a communication channel open, as you asked us to.
We will soon create a separate forum for more detailed GT conversations.
Cheers, Doru
On Dec 29, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse@inria.fr wrote:
Hi doru
Would it be possible to have a separate mailing-list for GT?
Stef
Stéphane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr http://www.synectique.eu / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Julie Jonas FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.feenk.com
"To utilize feedback, you first have to acquire it."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Stéphane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr http://www.synectique.eu / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Julie Jonas FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.feenk.com
"No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-------------------------------------------- Stéphane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr http://www.synectique.eu / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Julie Jonas FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France