30 Jul
2015
30 Jul
'15
2:49 p.m.
So, I looked
at the code a bit. We should integrate this as soon as
possible.
However, first we need to address a couple of issues:
- the traversing of parents like described above
As explained above, we disagree.
> - there should be no need for the <parentMetaClass:> annotation. This is
> derived from the parentSelector
> - the parentSelector annotation should be moved to the method that defines
> the property. Also, we should prefix it with MSE and I would call it
> ParentScope. So, something like this: FAMIXType>>container
> <MSEProperty: #container type: #FAMIXContainerEntity opposite: #types>
> <MSEComment: 'Container entity to which this type belongs to. Container is
> a namespace, not a package (Smalltalk).'>
> *<MSEParentScope>*
> ^container