27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
4:35 p.m.
I do not really know. But this is an important issue.
I experienced some problem when I modify some class extension in Smalltalk, then got some
problem when loading back in Moose.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 27 Oct 2010, at 11:27, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently looking at the use of the PackageOrganizerCache in Moose.
There was some work in pharo about a new, more performant, better-structured (I think
it's the idea ? :)) 'Package system' called RPackage.
So before doing anything, I would like to know more about the use of
PackageOrganizerCache:
- Why do we use a cache ? I guess this is because accessing directly parent packages of
specific classes or methods was to slow using the current package system.
- If this is the good answer :), why was it too long? could another package system
(RPackage) solve this problem and avoid us to use a cache ?
- For which kind of task is used the packageCache in Moose? I saw that it was used at the
import of smalltalk code, to link classes and method to their parent package, is that all
?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.