19 Oct
2007
19 Oct
'07
9:08 a.m.
Sounds good.
I have problem to read the document
Why this is not UML (because you generate it)
I do not understand
--------------------------
Invocation
sender: Behavioral -> outgoinginvocations
--------------------------
How should I read that?
I do not understand why the receiver of an invocation which is a
namedENtity
has to be in package. for example if I have self or super as receiver
do we have to say that this is
in a package and all the rest? For expressions most of the time you
do not have modifiers, name, pakagedIn...
For example
foo := (super new with: #(jklhklh kjhhkjhjkh) size.
Is there a relation between name and packagein?
Why the variables do not hold value? or I do not get it.
How do you model that Transript is referencing an instance of
TranscriptStream and that it is references by
a lot of methods (incomingAccesses)
I do not understand how you can express that
foo is defined in a different package than its class.
How can I say that a class belong to a namespact is defined in a
package and is extended in others?
Just a silly question: why don't we take EMOF as a starting point for
FAMIX3.0 since they already spent months
rying to design it? We could remove and add what we need.
Stef