Sounds good. I have problem to read the document Why this is not UML (because you generate it)
I do not understand -------------------------- Invocation sender: Behavioral -> outgoinginvocations -------------------------- How should I read that?
I do not understand why the receiver of an invocation which is a namedENtity has to be in package. for example if I have self or super as receiver do we have to say that this is in a package and all the rest? For expressions most of the time you do not have modifiers, name, pakagedIn... For example
foo := (super new with: #(jklhklh kjhhkjhjkh) size.
Is there a relation between name and packagein?
Why the variables do not hold value? or I do not get it. How do you model that Transript is referencing an instance of TranscriptStream and that it is references by a lot of methods (incomingAccesses)
I do not understand how you can express that
foo is defined in a different package than its class.
How can I say that a class belong to a namespact is defined in a package and is extended in others?
Just a silly question: why don't we take EMOF as a starting point for FAMIX3.0 since they already spent months rying to design it? We could remove and add what we need.
Stef