On Jul 23, 2012, at 9:54 PM, jannik.laval wrote:
On Jul 23, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Jannik,
Some questions:
- is there any reason to support vervainJ instead of InFamix ? Would it make sense to support both ?
This is a long discussion. I know that VerveinJ works fine. It is open-soure and well-maintained. Maybe Nicolas Anquetil has already done a comparison between the two importers.
Unfortunately, VerveineJ is not open-source. It is at the moment available to be used, but as it stands, the license is not specified at all. This is why the page says that you should contact Stef for getting information about the license. It would be great to clarify this point to avoid confusion in the future :).
Ok, the status has changed no ? Why is it not clear about the status ?
because we do not know if having a java extractor cannot kill synectique. So between giving a chance to synectique and having an open-source project we chose to give a chance to synectique and again there should be a middle way: this can be something else than open-source or nothing but so far nobody pushed the idea further.
Jannik
Cheers, Doru _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Jannik Laval
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev