28 Jun
2007
28 Jun
'07
5:16 p.m.
On 28 juin 07, at 11:52, Martin Pinzger wrote:
Hi,
Here is our FAMIX core model for representing Java source code.
http://seal.ifi.unizh.ch/wiki/swiki/show/FamixCore
There are some differences in naming that can be easily fixed, such
as we use "parent" instead of "belongsTo". The other main difference
concerns modifiers of entities. We use an integer to represent the
scope, static, abstract, etc. modifier of classes, methods, and
attributes instead of having extra attributes.
Indeed this would be an idea. Do you have a way to say that a value
is unknown
For example I want to say that a method is a getter but I could also
want to say that it is
not known that it is a getter that is different from it is not a getter.
Furthermore, we added
an abstract "Conext" class to indicate container entities (i.e.,
entities that can contain other famix entities).
Feel free to use and comment.
--Martin.
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Martin,
At FAMOOSr you mentioned that you performed renamings on FAMIX?
Could you summarize them?
The current names of the elements can be found in the UML diagram:
http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/famixmetamodel/
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Dr. Martin Pinzger
University of Zurich, Department of Informatics
http://seal.ifi.uzh.ch/pinzger
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev