Ok, then I would suggest to revert to the original changes and only leave the helper traversals.
Doru
On 22 Mar 2010, at 11:30, Simon Denier wrote:
On 22 mars 2010, at 09:15, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I see that there are changes that go back and forth in the Cook API. For example, FAMIXMethod>>sureIncomingInvocations just returned to the original implementation.
What is happening in this area? :)
We are trying to rationalize/simplify/optimize the implementation of Cook using some kind of specs. This is mostly brainstorming for now.
Were the original changes of Cyrille just an experiment? If yes, we should leave them out for now. If no, why is the situation reverted only for the case of sureIncomingInvocations?
I agree that we should leave them out for 4.0. I think that Jannik noticed that DSM tests failed on sureIncomingInvocations and that's why it was reverted. One related issue is that we still dont have development branches so we cant test the new implementation independently (still a few issues to work out in the wizard).
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."