12 Sep
2011
12 Sep
'11
8:41 p.m.
On Sep 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Yes this is what we did.
Hi,
On 12 Sep 2011, at 18:04, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Ok no problem. This is just that the system does not see a value in these tags else they
would be up to date.
Hi guys
I would like to know if at the fame level we can tag a method as an extension of a fame
package.
I saw that class implements annotation methods which contain this tag and I'm
curious.
I thought that we could do it with fame (when I remember the meta model of fame).
I imagine that I can query all the methods with that label but does fame infrastructure
provides a query?
I am not sure anymore what the status here is. You can package a property in a different
package, but the pragma processor does not seem to take into account. Then I was
thinking that we get comment at the meta level but this is not the case (is it true?) so
for now we will use
Smalltalk class comments.
Comments are not supported at all in Fame. What we have is just:
- Smalltalk class comments for the MetaDescription
- <MSEComment: ''> for the property
Please take a look at the MooseMetaBrowser open: - for classes you can enter the comments directly in
the editor to the right
Ok I was not aware that we could edit it.
I will check how we can access the <MSEComment: >
- for methods you can only read it for now, but it
would be great if someone would generate the <MSEComment:''> for the text
presented there
Cheers,
Doru
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev