[Moose-dev] Re: Issue 999 in moose-technology: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class

Comment #3 on issue 999 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=999

Ok, I understand the concern.

The reason for the current implementation of isAnonymousClass is that other importers (like inFamix) are less accurate than VerveineJ, and because of that we wanted to accommodate a bit of variations for this check.

So, the conclusion you draw from the implementation is not quite correct.

I like the definition of isAnonymousClass as it is in VerveineJ. For issue 998, we have to find a different solution.

But, how did VerveineJ named the class as anonymous?