[Moose-dev] Re: Issue 999 in moose-technology: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class

Comment #3 on issue 999 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=999 Ok, I understand the concern. The reason for the current implementation of isAnonymousClass is that other importers (like inFamix) are less accurate than VerveineJ, and because of that we wanted to accommodate a bit of variations for this check. So, the conclusion you draw from the implementation is not quite correct. I like the definition of isAnonymousClass as it is in VerveineJ. For issue 998, we have to find a different solution. But, how did VerveineJ named the class as anonymous? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings