3 Jan
2012
3 Jan
'12
3:21 p.m.
We recently
discussed about Glamour.
Who is we? Something like this:
a list
allowItemDrag: [:item :list | ... ];
itemDrag: [:item :list | ... ]
a list
allowDropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ];
dropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ]
It is often not clear what the object referenced by "a" is. Even for me. You seem to imply that it can take many forms :). But,
"a" is always used in examples to denote an instance of
GLMCompositePresentation. Always.
Ah okays. But this is not easy to infer this from browsing the code of andShow:.
Maybe just saying that the block expect an instance of GLMCompositePresentation as
argument will help.
Anyway, what is your point? :)
Simply trying to help to document Glamour better. My students bumped into those problem
(they are very beginners however).
Whatever the discussion on the pharo mailing list, whether Glamour should be part of Pharo
or not, whether Glamour compete against OB or not, Glamour make us really productive. Juan
Pablo is designing a new version of Versionner based on Glamour. We are so fast in
designing UI and we have so much freedom.
I did not measure it, but I think we are between 10 or 20 times faster with Glamour than
directly with Morphic. Glamour simply cannot be ignored.
Happy new year, once more :-)
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.