13 Dec
2007
13 Dec
'07
5:50 p.m.
Me too, I subclass from Scanner (see yourself Meta.MSEParser)
AA
On 13 Dec 2007, at 15:35 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
ok if you have your dedicated scanner then this is different. I
thought that you reused
the one of Smalltalk. The original CDIF one used the one of Smalltalk
since serge did not use Smacc.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Apparently this is no what I understood from the first
mse format.
Adrian's first implementation used a literal array representation
just to avoid to do the -TRUE- to true kind of conversion. Adrian
can
you comment on that?
The first prototype re-used the Smalltalk parser, right. Now we use a
custom scanner / parser as this is faster.