Me too, I subclass from Scanner (see yourself Meta.MSEParser)
AA
On 13 Dec 2007, at 15:35 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Apparently this is no what I understood from the first mse format. Adrian's first implementation used a literal array representation just to avoid to do the -TRUE- to true kind of conversion. Adrian can you comment on that?
The first prototype re-used the Smalltalk parser, right. Now we use a custom scanner / parser as this is faster.
ok if you have your dedicated scanner then this is different. I thought that you reused the one of Smalltalk. The original CDIF one used the one of Smalltalk since serge did not use Smacc.
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev